I'd like to strongly encourage you as well to add native support for at least git and Mercurial into LP.
I must admit that despite the fact that I really like bazaar the fact that LP development is clutching so vehemently to bzr has a strange taste to it - there are enough other good features in bzr to convice developers. Applying the force of bundling has never been a good concept to make OSS developers use a specific solution.
I for myself would like to bundle my coding activities using self-hosted LP but currently this is cumbersome because as a contract worker I have to use git as well as my customers want me to. There are probably a significant number of other devs facing a similar situation.
So please rethink your decision. It strongly harms deployment popularity of LP just for the dubious cause of pushing bzr.
I'd like to strongly encourage you as well to add native support for at least git and Mercurial into LP.
I must admit that despite the fact that I really like bazaar the fact that LP development is clutching so vehemently to bzr has a strange taste to it - there are enough other good features in bzr to convice developers. Applying the force of bundling has never been a good concept to make OSS developers use a specific solution.
I for myself would like to bundle my coding activities using self-hosted LP but currently this is cumbersome because as a contract worker I have to use git as well as my customers want me to. There are probably a significant number of other devs facing a similar situation.
So please rethink your decision. It strongly harms deployment popularity of LP just for the dubious cause of pushing bzr.