On 10.02.2010 20:28, Deryck Hodge wrote:
> I'll just remind everyone involved that making +upstreamreport be all it
> can be is far afield of the original agreed upon story-patch-report
> work. I think it's reasonable that we fix +upstreamreport as it relates
> to patch tracking, and if there is work that can be done easily while
> we're working on that aspect, then by all means let's fix it.
Agreed. My intention is to only add the new number proposed by Jorge (as
a link to the same page as the entire delta, bug with an additional
query parameter "field.has_patch=on"), and perhaps to add some tooltips.
>
> I do, however, want us to be deliberate about the work we take on and
> not try to cram in everything related to patches or upstreams and end up
> over-committed and under-delivering. We still have to finish the
> timeout and UI issues to complete the work we originally promised, which
> should take priority over any new work.
>
>
> Cheers,
> deryck
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10.02.2010 20:28, Deryck Hodge wrote:
> I'll just remind everyone involved that making +upstreamreport be all it
> can be is far afield of the original agreed upon story-patch-report
> work. I think it's reasonable that we fix +upstreamreport as it relates
> to patch tracking, and if there is work that can be done easily while
> we're working on that aspect, then by all means let's fix it.
Agreed. My intention is to only add the new number proposed by Jorge (as has_patch= on"), and perhaps to add some tooltips.
a link to the same page as the entire delta, bug with an additional
query parameter "field.
>
> I do, however, want us to be deliberate about the work we take on and
> not try to cram in everything related to patches or upstreams and end up
> over-committed and under-delivering. We still have to finish the
> timeout and UI issues to complete the work we originally promised, which
> should take priority over any new work.
>
>
> Cheers,
> deryck
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
Phm8NrtARAgSgAK CFeAcF7LBtMYSsx x0CQxvtOS9o5ACf RNJo KzljjqKo=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFLc9mEekB
f9AuJFmdSv6JPDn
=NT5S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----