I'll just remind everyone involved that making +upstreamreport be all it can be is far afield of the original agreed upon story-patch-report work. I think it's reasonable that we fix +upstreamreport as it relates to patch tracking, and if there is work that can be done easily while we're working on that aspect, then by all means let's fix it.
I do, however, want us to be deliberate about the work we take on and not try to cram in everything related to patches or upstreams and end up over-committed and under-delivering. We still have to finish the timeout and UI issues to complete the work we originally promised, which should take priority over any new work.
I'll just remind everyone involved that making +upstreamreport be all it can be is far afield of the original agreed upon story-patch-report work. I think it's reasonable that we fix +upstreamreport as it relates to patch tracking, and if there is work that can be done easily while we're working on that aspect, then by all means let's fix it.
I do, however, want us to be deliberate about the work we take on and not try to cram in everything related to patches or upstreams and end up over-committed and under-delivering. We still have to finish the timeout and UI issues to complete the work we originally promised, which should take priority over any new work.
Cheers,
deryck