In the spirit of not losing any possibly-related information:
There's a thread on the ubuntu-distributed-devel list called:
"FYI: ubuntu-devel thread about merge proposals" https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/2009-December/000164.html
started by James Westby, that's related to the question of what happens when the user requests a review. The first message in that thread is, as its subject implies, basically a pointer to this *other* thread on ubuntu-devel:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-December/029694.html
which is also by James; he describes it as being "about who the default reviewer should be for Ubuntu merge proposals".
Both threads may have relevant discussion.
In the spirit of not losing any possibly-related information:
There's a thread on the ubuntu- distributed- devel list called:
"FYI: ubuntu-devel thread about merge proposals" /lists. ubuntu. com/archives/ ubuntu- distributed- devel/2009- December/ 000164. html
https:/
started by James Westby, that's related to the question of what happens when the user requests a review. The first message in that thread is, as its subject implies, basically a pointer to this *other* thread on ubuntu-devel:
https:/ /lists. ubuntu. com/archives/ ubuntu- devel/2009- December/ 029694. html
which is also by James; he describes it as being "about who the default reviewer should be for Ubuntu merge proposals".
Both threads may have relevant discussion.