On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Michael
Nelson<email address hidden> wrote:
> Martin, let me know any wording changes etc., and I'll try to get it on
> edge tonight (if it is what you were after).
>
> ** Attachment added: "ppas-in-packages.ogv"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28624082/ppas-in-packages.ogv
I think this looks good! I'd change the expander text to "Other
versions of mozilla-firefox in untrusted archives". You can explain
the criteria for which they where selected inside the expanded text:
"Most recently updated unsupported and....".
I agree with Scott that ideally we would do this after we've figured
out how to do PPA rankings, but that discussion is a long one, and
getting out feet wet and having some experience will help us have that
discussion with more information.
ui=bueno from me, thanks for all the hard work Michael, I know this
was especially hard :)
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Michael packages. ogv" launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 28624082/ ppas-in- packages. ogv
Nelson<email address hidden> wrote:
> Martin, let me know any wording changes etc., and I'll try to get it on
> edge tonight (if it is what you were after).
>
> ** Attachment added: "ppas-in-
> http://
I think this looks good! I'd change the expander text to "Other
versions of mozilla-firefox in untrusted archives". You can explain
the criteria for which they where selected inside the expanded text:
"Most recently updated unsupported and....".
I agree with Scott that ideally we would do this after we've figured
out how to do PPA rankings, but that discussion is a long one, and
getting out feet wet and having some experience will help us have that
discussion with more information.
ui=bueno from me, thanks for all the hard work Michael, I know this
was especially hard :)
--
Martin