Comment 5 for bug 280578

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Jonathan Lange wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>>> Blocked on other bugs -- I'm not certain on the numbers. Before we can
>>>> do this, we have to make sure that the scanner isn't generating diffs.
>>> Why aren't you sure the scanner isn't generating diffs?
>>>
>>
>> That's been the blocker historically -- I'm trying to get this stuff
>> written down.
>
> So, I did the work to split diffs out a while back.  It's done.  It's
> landed.  Did I fail to communicate that?  Or do you think I did it wrong?
>

Or I could have failed to listen properly.

>> Are you aware of any blockers now?
>
> We're generating logs with -v, and that means doing almost as much work
> as diff does.  That's what my other branch is meant to address.
>

OK, that's good to know. Please comment on this bug when that's landed.

... although I guess we'll probably have to wait until it's released
before we can start moving the scanner around.

jml