Comment 4 for bug 280578

Revision history for this message
Aaron Bentley (abentley) wrote : Re: [Bug 280578] Re: Scan branches immediately after pulling them

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>> Blocked on other bugs -- I'm not certain on the numbers. Before we can
>>> do this, we have to make sure that the scanner isn't generating diffs.
>> Why aren't you sure the scanner isn't generating diffs?
>>
>
> That's been the blocker historically -- I'm trying to get this stuff
> written down.

So, I did the work to split diffs out a while back. It's done. It's
landed. Did I fail to communicate that? Or do you think I did it wrong?

> Are you aware of any blockers now?

We're generating logs with -v, and that means doing almost as much work
as diff does. That's what my other branch is meant to address.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmlx0gACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0sawCeKCnhCedImuLQqoN+YKquyKUc
jjUAmwa07I+O+4Nr5InOfb9frO73lL5j
=77PD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----