Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>> Blocked on other bugs -- I'm not certain on the numbers. Before we can
>>> do this, we have to make sure that the scanner isn't generating diffs.
>> Why aren't you sure the scanner isn't generating diffs?
>>
>
> That's been the blocker historically -- I'm trying to get this stuff
> written down.
So, I did the work to split diffs out a while back. It's done. It's
landed. Did I fail to communicate that? Or do you think I did it wrong?
> Are you aware of any blockers now?
We're generating logs with -v, and that means doing almost as much work
as diff does. That's what my other branch is meant to address.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jonathan Lange wrote:
>>> Blocked on other bugs -- I'm not certain on the numbers. Before we can
>>> do this, we have to make sure that the scanner isn't generating diffs.
>> Why aren't you sure the scanner isn't generating diffs?
>>
>
> That's been the blocker historically -- I'm trying to get this stuff
> written down.
So, I did the work to split diffs out a while back. It's done. It's
landed. Did I fail to communicate that? Or do you think I did it wrong?
> Are you aware of any blockers now?
We're generating logs with -v, and that means doing almost as much work
as diff does. That's what my other branch is meant to address.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkm lx0gACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI0sawCeKC nhCedImuLQqoN+ YKquyKUc O+4Nr5InOfb9frO 73lL5j
jjUAmwa07I+
=77PD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----