If I understand from the packager point of view, the first proposal (a single global overview for each language), this would be perfect! The packager is more interested by the global vision, not the specificities of a module.
And the second for the translator would be perfect to.
If I understand from the packager point of view, the first proposal (a single global overview for each language), this would be perfect! The packager is more interested by the global vision, not the specificities of a module.
And the second for the translator would be perfect to.
Thanks for your great reply!