Comment 16 for bug 264138

Hello LP,

I don't know if this is the case, but I was actually amazed to see how many
people evaluate projects without contacting the developers involved in that
project.

I also have trouble understanding what is missing from the OSM. "OSM's
inaccurate/incompleteness of data" - this tells me you have unspecified
problems with that project. If you were more specific I would have contacted
the OSM team myself to tell them about the problem.

Or maybe you have contacted them.
Anyway what I would like to see here is something like this:
- we, the LP team asked the OSM team about this feature A, the accuracy in
this area
- OSM responded...
- as a conclusion feature X we need is not covered by OSM now, but according
to their roadmap it will be in 1 year

What I mean is that you should let others follow you train of thoughts about
this issue (this idea leads to this, which in turn leads to...).
I do not want to sound disrespectful - any imperative in my writings comes
from bad use of the language as I come from a different culture.

Bye,
Bogdan

--
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it.", 1971, Alan Kay:
http://www.smalltalk.org/alankay.html