The format in Matt's complete example doesn't parse as rfc2822 message. Can we please keep those messages parseable? It's a matter of adding the 'Changes:' header back and ensuring the changes are properly indented and contain no blank lines, just as the current format.
The format in Matt's complete example doesn't parse as rfc2822 message. Can we please keep those messages parseable? It's a matter of adding the 'Changes:' header back and ensuring the changes are properly indented and contain no blank lines, just as the current format.