binNMU is a misnomer here. We don't want binary uploads in Ubuntu, nor do we have a concept of NMUs.
The use case here (which, in Debian, is fulfilled by binNMUs) is to rebuild a package for one architecture without changing the source package or the other architectures.
If this sort of rebuild could be provided by Launchpad in a sane way, I don't see why it should be objectionable.
binNMU is a misnomer here. We don't want binary uploads in Ubuntu, nor do we have a concept of NMUs.
The use case here (which, in Debian, is fulfilled by binNMUs) is to rebuild a package for one architecture without changing the source package or the other architectures.
If this sort of rebuild could be provided by Launchpad in a sane way, I don't see why it should be objectionable.