On 4 June 2011 11:52, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> On 4 June 2011 05:17, Geoff <email address hidden> wrote:
>>> Really all I am waiting on is for someone to approve the LEP. (It's
>>> currently in the "Ready for review" section)
>>
>> If you're planning to work on this yourself you don't strictly need to
>> block on LEP approval to start discussing the implementation, or even
>> working on the code.
>
> In this particular case I have suggested we get consensus around what
> we want to do: a poor (UI/concept/implementation) of a wiki in
> Launchpad is something that wouldn't be accepted; I'd hate for Geoff
> or anyone to put significant effort in and have it rejected.
Same here. My point (maybe poorly expressed) is that what he needs is
a good clear plan, not for someone to rubber stamp it.
On 4 June 2011 11:52, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote: implementation) of a wiki in
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> On 4 June 2011 05:17, Geoff <email address hidden> wrote:
>>> Really all I am waiting on is for someone to approve the LEP. (It's
>>> currently in the "Ready for review" section)
>>
>> If you're planning to work on this yourself you don't strictly need to
>> block on LEP approval to start discussing the implementation, or even
>> working on the code.
>
> In this particular case I have suggested we get consensus around what
> we want to do: a poor (UI/concept/
> Launchpad is something that wouldn't be accepted; I'd hate for Geoff
> or anyone to put significant effort in and have it rejected.
Same here. My point (maybe poorly expressed) is that what he needs is
a good clear plan, not for someone to rubber stamp it.