Comment 2 for bug 196590
Revision history for this message
| LaserJock (laserjock) wrote Re: bug expiry: inactive users vs inactive developers | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
I feel like there is still a point to this bug though. You are giving a workflow but how do you know that's actually what's going on? Often times a triager sets the status to Incomplete, somebody comments, and the bug just sits there waiting for a triager/developer to return. I know you guys are trying to make Incomplete a temporary state but my experience so far indicates it's often not. How are we supposed to indicate a bug that is really incomplete without worrying that it'll expire?
I think the point of this bug report is to say that this might be seen as punishing bug reporters for a lack of activity by developers/