On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:00:24PM -0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> No. I didn't.
Your bug summary stated:
Mailed bug attachments aren't attached, but in the bug itself
I'm sorry that I intepreted "aren't attached" as "the bug attachments
aren't attached to the bug. As I said, feel free to correct my mistake.
> Someone else complained in this bug about attachments being lost.
Yes, and it was marked as a duplicate of this bug before I edited it.
> Bugs like this are trivial to detect in testing. Clearly QA is shoved on
> the end users. I'm finished doing volunteer QA on someone else's
> commercial product.
We did detect that text attachments were added to the
comment/description itself. We didn't consider this to be a showstopper,
though.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:00:24PM -0000, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> No. I didn't.
Your bug summary stated:
Mailed bug attachments aren't attached, but in the bug itself
I'm sorry that I intepreted "aren't attached" as "the bug attachments
aren't attached to the bug. As I said, feel free to correct my mistake.
> Someone else complained in this bug about attachments being lost.
Yes, and it was marked as a duplicate of this bug before I edited it.
> Bugs like this are trivial to detect in testing. Clearly QA is shoved on
> the end users. I'm finished doing volunteer QA on someone else's
> commercial product.
We did detect that text attachments were added to the
comment/description itself. We didn't consider this to be a showstopper,
though.