This is a good idea. If it came down to a choice, I think I'd rather have bzr+http working though (see bug 165087).
Also, instead of advertising bzr:// URLs, we're intending to advertise branches using lp:/// URLs.
This is a good idea. If it came down to a choice, I think I'd rather have bzr+http working though (see bug 165087).
Also, instead of advertising bzr:// URLs, we're intending to advertise branches using lp:/// URLs.