Comment 19 for bug 306630

On 05/13/2010 02:58 PM, Holger Berndt wrote:
> @Darshaka Pathirana:
> How can you "full ACK" a statement that you oppose in your very next
> sentence? Walter proposed to ALWAYS queue files, which is definitely
> not a good idea. "Do something more than just always process in
> parallel or always queue", be it to ask the user, have some smart
> logic or a mixture of the two, is what I wrote about, and is in any
> case not a trivial change.

Ok, sorry. Full ACK went to the statement "The request is *not* to
implement: <<Intelligent file copy optimization>>"..

I did'n state that the change to a queueing behavoir would be trivial.
But I fully agree with the fact that there are some pieces of software
which implement the needed feature... e.g. TotalCommand let's you
choose wheter the file should be copied immediately or be queued.

So again: we (at least me and Walter) don't need the "intelligence" on
software side instead just let the user choose (e.g a seperate "add to
copy-queue" option).

Regards,
 - Darsha