On the surface it's not unreasonable, but it's an approach that's not really maintainable. For packages like this, there really isn't a good in-archive solution. A dedicated PPA is probably your best approach. I understand Canonical is doing something similar (dedicated PPA) to get Python 2.6 into Hardy.
On the surface it's not unreasonable, but it's an approach that's not really maintainable. For packages like this, there really isn't a good in-archive solution. A dedicated PPA is probably your best approach. I understand Canonical is doing something similar (dedicated PPA) to get Python 2.6 into Hardy.