Comment 20 for bug 227945

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:11:45AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
> On 12/08/2008 09:21 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
> > Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 01:56:01, John Vivirito a écrit :
> >> Added Ubuntu task and assigned asac to review and push as needed
> >>
> >
> > There is already iceweasel-firegpg in unstable/main and jaunty/universe.
> > Isn't it a better idea to merge it instead of repackaging it from
> > scratch?
> >
> We dont use iceweasel we use abrowser. We shouldnt have to fix each of

Where did I say that we use iceweasel?

> the iceweasel packages to support other browsers since at this time it
> only depends on iceweasel and the packages are not updated but ours
> are.

Right, I understand (this looks like duplicate work though). Then you may
want to drop from the archive several iceweasel-* packages that landed in
jaunty.

> We dont merge any mozilla apps from debian and we havee it so they get
> our packages.

"it" == firegpg?
"they" == debian?
Why would Debian get our firegpg package?

--
Lionel Le Folgoc - https://launchpad.net/~mrpouit
EEBA 555E 0CDE 92BB 3AF4 4AB3 45A0 357B 5179 5910