> XScreensaver implements no D-Bus interface. The D-Bus interface should work
> in GNOME and KDE though.
For some reason i thought that XSS not only had it, but also was the first one to implement it. But it seems that its developer isn't too keen on this new "kit & bus" fashion.
So now one has to use those abominations just to have a screensaver ? Then `xdg-screensaver` abstraction should have, probably, been used instead of direct dbus calls. It supports both dbus and console commands.
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #80)
> It's not "dbus xscreensaver interface support". It has nothing to do with
> XScreensaver.
Ah, just noticed ancient https:/ /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 377056
> XScreensaver implements no D-Bus interface. The D-Bus interface should work
> in GNOME and KDE though.
For some reason i thought that XSS not only had it, but also was the first one to implement it. But it seems that its developer isn't too keen on this new "kit & bus" fashion.
So now one has to use those abominations just to have a screensaver ? Then `xdg-screensaver` abstraction should have, probably, been used instead of direct dbus calls. It supports both dbus and console commands.
Otherwise https:/ /launchpad. net/caffeine shim is the only cross-DE option, it seems.