On 23 Nov 2005, Matt Zimmerman <email address hidden> wrote: > We don't need to preserve symlinks?
You're quite right, there should be a -l in there as well.
-- Martin
On 23 Nov 2005, Matt Zimmerman <email address hidden> wrote:
> We don't need to preserve symlinks?
You're quite right, there should be a -l in there as well.
--
Martin