Comment 5 for bug 45719
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 45719] Re: update command cannot take a revision number | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 05:13 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I was surprised to see that svn revert does *not* accept a -r parameter.
> Actually I remember being annoyed by this in the past - if you want to
> roll back to a previous text you must do so through svn cat or merge.
svn update -r revision
Because svn revision numbers are not tree wide, it has a less strict
separation between revert and update.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://