Martin Pool wrote:
> 2009/8/15 Robert Collins <email address hidden>:
>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>>> OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be
>>> fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
>> I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
>
> At least some of these were
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/413541.
>
> I'd be happy to delete that name; we'll also need to remove some code
> that internally relies on it; it's not quite totally trivial. Maybe
> we could hide it.
>
I would also mention that it might break scripts that people were using
to convert from svn, for example.
I would rather make it hidden than removed. Or possibly deprecate it.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Pool wrote: /bugs.edge. launchpad. net/bzr/ +bug/413541.
> 2009/8/15 Robert Collins <email address hidden>:
>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>>> OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be
>>> fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
>> I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
>
> At least some of these were
> https:/
>
> I'd be happy to delete that name; we'll also need to remove some code
> that internally relies on it; it's not quite totally trivial. Maybe
> we could hide it.
>
I would also mention that it might break scripts that people were using
to convert from svn, for example.
I would rather make it hidden than removed. Or possibly deprecate it.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkq Gvl8ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMXvACePXHct uUoRAT4xOC+ cliPR74U Sp+WpudUF5WSEnj Sk
UQ8AoJUWSwJ9muL
=XViw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----