2009/8/15 Robert Collins <email address hidden>:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>> OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be
>> fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
>
> I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
I'd be happy to delete that name; we'll also need to remove some code
that internally relies on it; it's not quite totally trivial. Maybe
we could hide it.
2009/8/15 Robert Collins <email address hidden>:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>> OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be
>> fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
>
> I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
At least some of these were https:/ /bugs.edge. launchpad. net/bzr/ +bug/413541.
I'd be happy to delete that name; we'll also need to remove some code
that internally relies on it; it's not quite totally trivial. Maybe
we could hide it.
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://