On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote: > OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be > fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
-Rob
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:21 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> OK, so there now seem to be more failures in stacking; they might be
> fixed by the default-rich-root fix, or maybe not.
I think we should delete default-rich-root as part of the move to 2.0.
-Rob