Comment 14 for bug 390502
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 390502] Re: bzr's development should dogfood format 2a | #14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:30 +0000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> > Taking that document as a lead, the approach seems to be to switch the
> > development focus so that stacked branches can be left untouched.
> > Do we still need to upgrade stacked branches then?
> >
> Not completely sure but I suspect not, at least not all of them.
>
> For outstanding reviews say, we may want to upgrade those. After
> upgrading the branch locally, just pushing again (with a new name?)
> ought to do it.
We hsould be able to just upgrade the trunk in-place, and then upgrade
the branches in-place. Why mess around with extra copies etc that just
have to be cleaned up?
-Rob