Bazaar

  1. Bug #390502
  2. Comment #13

Comment 13 for bug 390502

Revision history for this message
Ian Clatworthy (ian-clatworthy) wrote : Re: [Bug 390502] Re: bzr's development should dogfood format 2a

Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:09:09PM -0000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>
>> That doc hasn't landed yet - it still in a to-be-reviewed patch.
>>
>
> Could you point me at the patch? I don't see it in either
> +activereviews or on BB, but bzr.dev does have a doc/en/upgrade-guide.
>
>
 Sorry - I was talking crap. That patch was approved and landed. (I was
thinking of my smooth-upgrade patch when I wrote that.)

> Taking that document as a lead, the approach seems to be to switch the
> development focus so that stacked branches can be left untouched.
> Do we still need to upgrade stacked branches then?
>
Not completely sure but I suspect not, at least not all of them.

For outstanding reviews say, we may want to upgrade those. After
upgrading the branch locally, just pushing again (with a new name?)
ought to do it.

Ian C.