On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:09:09PM -0000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> John A Meinel wrote:
> > Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> >
> > > plan and ui for upgrading multiple stacked branches: bug #374735
> > > pushing a 1.9 branch stacked on a 2a branch: bug #393677
> >
> >
> > However, you should read the doc that Ian wrote up (I believe it is in
> > doc/*). Basically, you want to push up a *new* branch that is in the new
> > format, and then start stacking on top of that.
> >
>
> That doc hasn't landed yet - it still in a to-be-reviewed patch.
Could you point me at the patch? I don't see it in either
+activereviews or on BB, but bzr.dev does have a doc/en/upgrade-guide.
Taking that document as a lead, the approach seems to be to switch the
development focus so that stacked branches can be left untouched.
Do we still need to upgrade stacked branches then?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:09:09PM -0000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> John A Meinel wrote:
> > Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> >
> > > plan and ui for upgrading multiple stacked branches: bug #374735
> > > pushing a 1.9 branch stacked on a 2a branch: bug #393677
> >
> >
> > However, you should read the doc that Ian wrote up (I believe it is in
> > doc/*). Basically, you want to push up a *new* branch that is in the new
> > format, and then start stacking on top of that.
> >
>
> That doc hasn't landed yet - it still in a to-be-reviewed patch.
Could you point me at the patch? I don't see it in either upgrade- guide.
+activereviews or on BB, but bzr.dev does have a doc/en/
Taking that document as a lead, the approach seems to be to switch the
development focus so that stacked branches can be left untouched.
Do we still need to upgrade stacked branches then?
Wouter van Heyst