>> - lightweight checkout commit to a stacked branch does not work
>> + Commit to a stacked branch does not work
>
>
> I don't think this summary is as useful as it can be, because 'bound
> branches' can commit fine to stacked branches. I was hoping in my
> previous summary to steer a fine line
I found it misleading, because it implied that commits where the tree
and stacked branch were co-located would work, and they do not. It
implied a behavioural difference based on whether the branch and tree
were co-located, and those are very rare. It implied that
TreeTransform.commit would work, and it does not.
> - can you think of some better
> phrasing to indicate 'cannot commit without a bound branch', or something?
The only reason why commit via a bound branch works is because it's
pushing, not committing, to the stacked branch. Perhaps "cannot commit
directly to a stacked branch"?
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
> Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> - lightweight checkout commit to a stacked branch does not work
>> + Commit to a stacked branch does not work
>
>
> I don't think this summary is as useful as it can be, because 'bound
> branches' can commit fine to stacked branches. I was hoping in my
> previous summary to steer a fine line
I found it misleading, because it implied that commits where the tree commit would work, and it does not.
and stacked branch were co-located would work, and they do not. It
implied a behavioural difference based on whether the branch and tree
were co-located, and those are very rare. It implied that
TreeTransform.
> - can you think of some better
> phrasing to indicate 'cannot commit without a bound branch', or something?
The only reason why commit via a bound branch works is because it's
pushing, not committing, to the stacked branch. Perhaps "cannot commit
directly to a stacked branch"?
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkr KTCwACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI21/ QCfaoPwb3xHcTyv 5HRNzNMxDC/ w YjtiGfFL8vOy1rI Gnz4TS
WggAnAkSfW/
=5JVy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----