Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Changed title because this appears to affect all commits to stacked
> branches, not just when lightweight checkouts are involved.
>
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - lightweight checkout commit to a stacked branch does not work
> + Commit to a stacked branch does not work
>
I don't think this summary is as useful as it can be, because 'bound
branches' can commit fine to stacked branches. I was hoping in my
previous summary to steer a fine line - can you think of some better
phrasing to indicate 'cannot commit without a bound branch', or something?
- -Rob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Changed title because this appears to affect all commits to stacked
> branches, not just when lightweight checkouts are involved.
>
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - lightweight checkout commit to a stacked branch does not work
> + Commit to a stacked branch does not work
>
I don't think this summary is as useful as it can be, because 'bound
branches' can commit fine to stacked branches. I was hoping in my
previous summary to steer a fine line - can you think of some better
phrasing to indicate 'cannot commit without a bound branch', or something?
- -Rob enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkr DW7cACgkQ42zgmr PGrq50EwCgzSLjb KOoU8JlLAqSv0wR NzjT 935j0ne2nOpn4DH gHxSFeDE5
vVIAn3b/
=XKY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----