On 4/5/2011 2:49 AM, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 10:37, Max Bowsher <email address hidden> wrote:
>>> I think there's an XDG convention for how the environment variable
>>> should be named; we should use that.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the original requester is asking for a way to override
>> the *entire* directory name - i.e.
>> $NOTIONAL_NEW_ENV_VAR/{bazaar.conf,plugins/,locations.conf,...}
>
> Right.
>
>> As far as I know, XDG only operates at the level of defining conventions
>> for trees, within which apps reserve particular paths - not envvar
>> conventions for envvars private to specific apps?
>
> OK. I didn't check. Something like BZR_CONFIG_DIR could be good.
>
I thought that is what BZR_HOME does. Is it not handling plugins correctly?
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4/5/2011 2:49 AM, Martin Pool wrote: NEW_ENV_ VAR/{bazaar. conf,plugins/ ,locations. conf,.. .}
> On 5 April 2011 10:37, Max Bowsher <email address hidden> wrote:
>>> I think there's an XDG convention for how the environment variable
>>> should be named; we should use that.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the original requester is asking for a way to override
>> the *entire* directory name - i.e.
>> $NOTIONAL_
>
> Right.
>
>> As far as I know, XDG only operates at the level of defining conventions
>> for trees, within which apps reserve particular paths - not envvar
>> conventions for envvars private to specific apps?
>
> OK. I didn't check. Something like BZR_CONFIG_DIR could be good.
>
I thought that is what BZR_HOME does. Is it not handling plugins correctly?
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
a3BgACgkQJdeBCY SNAAP9WgCfeXSCg qllFTP3G8oW+ pvTXwWq VsHcEPLPlbbU7E/ nH
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk2
x88AmwaTmhhloCw
=RbBv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----