2009/4/21 Alexander Belchenko <email address hidden>:
> Martin Pool пишет:
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/bugs/340394
>>
>> Does anyone have a clear idea of
>> 1- what output encoding bzr should use on Windows when output is
>> redirected to a file and running in a terminal using cp850?
>
> What do you mean by "should"?
>
> Current implementation uses terminal encoding, in this case it will be
> cp850. If terminal is not available, then there will be used default user
> encoding, in this case it will be cp1252.
>
> Here is the list of supported encodings (ANSI and OEM):
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-ru/goglobal/bb964654(en-us).aspx
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-ru/goglobal/bb964655(en-us).aspx
>
> As you see there is no UTF-8 encoding in any form, so user unable to switch
> the terminal encoding to UTF-8. Only to cp1252, because it's the best match
> for cp850 (cp850 is OEM, cp1252 is ANSI encoding).
>
> To switch encoding of the terminal user can use chcp command.
> When this command invoked without arguments it will print current codepage.
>
> E.g. on my machine with Russian settings:
>
> C:\>chcp
> Active code page: 866
>
> C:\>chcp 1251
>
> C:\>chcp
> Active code page: 1251
>
>> 2- what mechanism if any should be available to control it?
>>
>> I suppose we could (like svn?) have a parameter that specifies the
>> output encoding...
>
> Yes, PLEASE. I think it should be global option, available to all commands.
> E.g.
>
> bzr --encoding=utf-8 log
OK, so I've changed bug 340394 to be about that, as it seems that we can't do any better at present by just using the encoding of the environment.
2009/4/21 Alexander Belchenko <email address hidden>: /launchpad. net/bugs/ 340394 msdn.microsoft. com/ru- ru/goglobal/ bb964654( en-us). aspx msdn.microsoft. com/ru- ru/goglobal/ bb964655( en-us). aspx
> Martin Pool пишет:
>>
>> https:/
>>
>> Does anyone have a clear idea of
>> 1- what output encoding bzr should use on Windows when output is
>> redirected to a file and running in a terminal using cp850?
>
> What do you mean by "should"?
>
> Current implementation uses terminal encoding, in this case it will be
> cp850. If terminal is not available, then there will be used default user
> encoding, in this case it will be cp1252.
>
> Here is the list of supported encodings (ANSI and OEM):
> http://
> http://
>
> As you see there is no UTF-8 encoding in any form, so user unable to switch
> the terminal encoding to UTF-8. Only to cp1252, because it's the best match
> for cp850 (cp850 is OEM, cp1252 is ANSI encoding).
>
> To switch encoding of the terminal user can use chcp command.
> When this command invoked without arguments it will print current codepage.
>
> E.g. on my machine with Russian settings:
>
> C:\>chcp
> Active code page: 866
>
> C:\>chcp 1251
>
> C:\>chcp
> Active code page: 1251
>
>> 2- what mechanism if any should be available to control it?
>>
>> I suppose we could (like svn?) have a parameter that specifies the
>> output encoding...
>
> Yes, PLEASE. I think it should be global option, available to all commands.
> E.g.
>
> bzr --encoding=utf-8 log
OK, so I've changed bug 340394 to be about that, as it seems that we can't do any better at present by just using the encoding of the environment.
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://