On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 18:26 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Users of ssh:// might well just be pushing to a random dumb server and
> expecting it to put the files there over SFTP. See bug 330507, where I
> note that this seems to be what a git user expected. I think sftp://
> would be a more reasonable alias than bzr+ssh:// would be.
I'm pretty sure the git user expected it to invoke git on the far end,
which is equivalent to bzr+ssh:// rather than sftp://.
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 18:26 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Users of ssh:// might well just be pushing to a random dumb server and
> expecting it to put the files there over SFTP. See bug 330507, where I
> note that this seems to be what a git user expected. I think sftp://
> would be a more reasonable alias than bzr+ssh:// would be.
I'm pretty sure the git user expected it to invoke git on the far end,
which is equivalent to bzr+ssh:// rather than sftp://.
-Rob