Martin Pool wrote:
> No, I didn't think of that case. Thanks for explaining it, John.
>
> This seems like one of those bugs for which you can do either a
> smaller or a larger (longer) fix, so I'd like to work out now what
> Guilhem wants. The small fix he originally requested is to block adds
> of ignored files.
I wouldn't like that much. If someone specifies that they want to add
an ignored file, why shouldn't we? They have to manually specify it,
(or use a wildcard) after all. A warning would be fine, but if we can
do what the user asks, I think we should.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Pool wrote:
> No, I didn't think of that case. Thanks for explaining it, John.
>
> This seems like one of those bugs for which you can do either a
> smaller or a larger (longer) fix, so I'd like to work out now what
> Guilhem wants. The small fix he originally requested is to block adds
> of ignored files.
I wouldn't like that much. If someone specifies that they want to add
an ignored file, why shouldn't we? They have to manually specify it,
(or use a wildcard) after all. A warning would be fine, but if we can
do what the user asks, I think we should.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkp d7I8ACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI0BYACePo /CBXiA2co+ e+PkqalWz6Ek LaP8f275H+ mq+JbWpO
UJwAnA4jaQAHw+
=1CMp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----