On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:20 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> My personal feeling is that the cache should be kept for Knit repos. I
> believe Robert wanted it out to help force developers to move apis over
> to better ones (like using get_revisions() instead of looping over
> get_revision). Though as most of us are now solely on pack repos, nobody
> really realizes how much performance on Knit repos has regressed. So
> that part of the experiment is a bit of a failure.
I wanted it gone because it has global impact, not format-specific
impact, it makes a lot of code more complex, drives up memory use and
has generally been an ongoing nuisance for code cleanup.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:20 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> My personal feeling is that the cache should be kept for Knit repos. I
> believe Robert wanted it out to help force developers to move apis over
> to better ones (like using get_revisions() instead of looping over
> get_revision). Though as most of us are now solely on pack repos, nobody
> really realizes how much performance on Knit repos has regressed. So
> that part of the experiment is a bit of a failure.
I wanted it gone because it has global impact, not format-specific
impact, it makes a lot of code more complex, drives up memory use and
has generally been an ongoing nuisance for code cleanup.
-Rob www.robertcolli ns.net/ keys.txt>.
--
GPG key available at: <http://