package is largely unusable and should be removed
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bughelper (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: bughelper
Bughelper relies on python-
If you could also remove python-
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bughelper 0.2.17
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: fee5e196cb921cb
CheckboxSystem: 2a6f54df59af338
Date: Thu Apr 15 09:49:52 2010
PackageArchitec
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
SourcePackage: bughelper
| Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in bughelper (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in bughelper (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Triaged → Fix Released |
$ lp-remove-
2010-04-16 21:38:20 INFO creating lockfile
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO Removing candidates:
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid amd64
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid armel
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid i386
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid ia64
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid powerpc
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid sparc
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid amd64
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid armel
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid i386
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid ia64
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid powerpc
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO python-bughelper 0.2.17 in lucid sparc
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO Removed-by: Jamie Strandboge
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO Comment: upstream authors say the project is dead and the package doesn't work in Lucid anyway (LP: #564020)
2010-04-16 21:38:26 INFO 13 packages successfully removed.
Confirm this transaction? [yes, no] yes
2010-04-16 21:38:32 INFO Transaction committed.
2010-04-16 21:38:32 INFO The archive will be updated in the next publishing cycle.