tuxtype depends on AndikaDesRevG.ttf

Bug #262776 reported by ibotty
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
tuxtype (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
tuxtype (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: tuxtype

.. but AndikaDesRevG.ttf is not in ttf-sil-andika as expected.
it thus fails to start.

symlinking AndBasR.ttf (from ttf-sil-andika) to AndikaDesRevG.ttf fixed this.

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote : Re: [Bug 262776] [NEW] tuxtype depends on AndikaDesRevG.ttf

Thanks. I'll forward to Debian to fix.

2008/8/29 ibotty <email address hidden>:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: tuxtype
>
> .. but AndikaDesRevG.ttf is not in ttf-sil-andika as expected.
> it thus fails to start.
>
> symlinking AndBasR.ttf (from ttf-sil-andika) to AndikaDesRevG.ttf fixed
> this.
>
> ** Affects: tuxtype (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> --
> tuxtype depends on AndikaDesRevG.ttf
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262776
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to tuxtype
> in ubuntu.
>

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

Which version of tuxtype was this in? Is this hardy or intrepid?

Revision history for this message
ibotty (ibotty) wrote : Re: [Bug 262776] Re: tuxtype depends on AndikaDesRevG.ttf

this was on intrepid, tuxtype 1.5.17, deb 1.5.17.dfsg1-1ubuntu1

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

That font seems to be in ttf-sil-andika in hardy (ttf-sil-andika (0.001.desrev-5)), but not in intrepid (ttf-sil-andika (1.0.basic-1) )

It doesn't seem to be in debian lenny, etch or sid.

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

This looks like a change in ttf-sil-andika. Can you check which version you have installed?

Changed in tuxtype:
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
ibotty (ibotty) wrote :

yes, this is with ttf-sil-andika 1.0.basic-1. upstream package (the
tarball on the sil-webpage) does not have this font either.

i guess, it just got renamed, as tuxtype looks good, if the new font is
symlinked to the right name.

the debian package (1.5.17.dfsg1-3) does not look at this place, so this
seems to have been fixed by debian or upstream.

syncing the version might be appropiate :)

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

You think this is fixed in 1.5.17.dfsg1-3?

ibotty (ibotty)
Changed in tuxtype:
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

looking at the Debian changelog this was probably fixed in 1.5.17.dfsg1-2.

http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tuxtype/tuxtype_1.5.17.dfsg1-3/changelog

 tuxtype (1.5.17.dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Bump Standards-version to 3.8.0, no changes needed.
   * Patch the source to use 1.0 basic release of the ttf-sil-andika fonts and
     not the "design review" version.

 -- Holger Levsen <email address hidden> Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:30 +0000

Revision history for this message
ibotty (ibotty) wrote :

yes, i removed the symlink and it works. did not before.

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

So a sync fixes it? Wonderful! Thanks for catching!

Przemek K. (azrael)
Changed in tuxtype (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Changed in tuxtype (Debian):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.