Cache misspelled as "cash" in description of all packagekit packages

Bug confirmed. Not sure if this is an upstream description problem or not.

Confirmed on all three packages.

Sorry Nick, didn't mean to stomp on your changes, you beat me to it after I loaded the page but before I made the changes.

That's no problem; I don't have Bug Control rights anyways :)

packagekit (0.1.6-0ubuntu3) intrepid; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Replaced 'cash' with 'cache' in descriptions (LP: #238438)

 -- Nathan Handler <email address hidden> Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:18:49 -0500

packagekit-gnome (0.1.6-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Replaced 'cash' with 'cache' in description (LP: #238438)

 -- Nathan Handler <email address hidden> Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:18:37 -0500

Should these statuses be marked as Triaged, as we have debdiffs and it appears ready for developers? And what about the -dev package? I am not familiar with those, is that a separate package that needs a fix, or does one of these fixes handle both? Thanks!

According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing, the status should be set to "Confirmed", and the bug should be assigned to nobody. Also, notice how I subscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the bug. These are all steps to take to add the bug to the Sponsorship Queue. Once it has been added to the queue, a MOTU will review the patch. If the patch is good, they will upload it.

The source package, packagekit, builds both the packagekit and the packagekit-dev binaries. You can see this by going to http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/intrepid/packagekit. Since patches are created for the source package, not the binary package, I only made two patches. The first one is for the packagekit source package. It fixes the spelling error in the packagekit and packagekit-dev binary packages. The second patch is for packagekit-gnome. It fixes the spelling error in the package-kit gnome binary package.

Thanks for the great explanation and links Nathan, I really appreciate it. If I am reading the correct section, should the 'patch' tag also be added to this?

When I attached the the patches, I checked the box that says, "This attachment is a patch". The "patch" tag serves a similar purpose. They both allow people to search Launchpad for bugs with patches. I don't believe either are required, but it is strongly suggested that they be included. As a result, I have added the "patch" tag to this bug.

Michael: can you please take a look at it?

This bug was fixed in the package packagekit - 0.2.2-0ubuntu2

---------------
packagekit (0.2.2-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Replaced 'cash' with 'cache' in description (LP: #238438)
    (thanks to Nathan Handler)

 -- Michael Vogt <email address hidden> Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:07:31 +0200

This bug was fixed in the package packagekit-gnome - 0.1.6-0ubuntu2

---------------
packagekit-gnome (0.1.6-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Replaced 'cash' with 'cache' in description (LP: #238438)

 -- Nathan Handler <email address hidden> Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:18:37 -0500