FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration

Bug #2061038 reported by Miriam España Acebal
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
whitedune (Debian)
New
Unknown
whitedune (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

y.tab.c:2666:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'yyerror'; did you mean 'yyerrok'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
rcparse.y: In function 'newBitmap':
rcparse.y:737:9: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
  737 | fread(bitmap->data + (bitmap->height - 1 - y) * width_in_bytes,
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  738 | 1, width_in_bytes, f);
      | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[...]

linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:525:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickHat’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  525 | SDL_PrivateJoystickHat(stick, hat,
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c: In function ‘JS_HandleEvents’:
linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:567:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickAxis’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  567 | SDL_PrivateJoystickAxis(joystick,
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:598:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickButton’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  598 | SDL_PrivateJoystickButton(joystick,
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c: In function ‘SDL_SYS_JoystickUpdate’:
linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:717:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickBall’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  717 | SDL_PrivateJoystickBall(joystick, (Uint8)i, xrel, yrel);
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118904/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.whitedune_0.30.10-2.2build4_BUILDING.txt.gz

Revision history for this message
Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) wrote :

Upstream's repo might be the one with this issue https://github.com/mufti11/white_dune/issues/3# .

Repo in the control file doesn't exist.

There is also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whitedune/+bug/1828832 for upgrading to a major and supposed continued version, but Debian is not there yet.

Changed in whitedune (Debian):
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package whitedune - 0.30.10-2.2ubuntu1

---------------
whitedune (0.30.10-2.2ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium

  * debian/patches/implicit-declarations.patch: Add missing includes and
    function prototypes. (LP: #2061038).

 -- Zixing Liu <email address hidden> Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:23:06 -0600

Changed in whitedune (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.