Excerpts from Steve Langasek's message of Tue Oct 04 00:02:17 UTC 2011:
> Clint, is this the 'static-network-up' job in oneiric, or is something
> else needed still?
>
I would like to have an empty "meta" job that all other things follow,
so instead of
start on runlevel [2345]
stop on runlevel [!2345]
Which ties to sysvinit and doesn't obviously reflect the authors
intentions, we'd have
start on starting network-services
stop on stopping network-services
This would probably just have the runlevel start on / stop on listed
above.
Excerpts from Steve Langasek's message of Tue Oct 04 00:02:17 UTC 2011:
> Clint, is this the 'static-network-up' job in oneiric, or is something
> else needed still?
>
I would like to have an empty "meta" job that all other things follow,
so instead of
start on runlevel [2345]
stop on runlevel [!2345]
Which ties to sysvinit and doesn't obviously reflect the authors
intentions, we'd have
start on starting network-services
stop on stopping network-services
This would probably just have the runlevel start on / stop on listed
above.