Comment 104 for bug 580961

Alkis, now you are really going too far with your character assassination and outright lying. You've signed the CoC, you should apologize.

I never asked for money to get this situation sorted, at least not for myself. I'm just fed up with people who make all kinds of grandish claims and demands but do zilch to get to a REAL solution. People who "NEED A FIX RIGHT NOW!1!" and can't code or package simply ought to pay someone to fix the issue or band together and pledge a bounty. People also still haven't understood that even if libnatspec were to work as intended and even if it were a step in the right direction getting it included wouldn't even be half-way to a proper fix. There'd still be many things left to be done. Insinuating that I was asking for money for myself for packaging libnatspec is so laughable it's not even funny ;-) Read through the ticket and you will see my many (ultimately failed) attempts to keep the ticket focused so a REAL developer will have a look at it.

Alkis, I've marked your ticket as a dupe to this one in the hope to focus discussion. That's a bit different than what you are hinting at with "he closed". You even thanked me for taking it up a few hours after I did that. You are so sneaky, it makes me sick.

I'm very happy I left this ticket. Unfortunately, I cannot completely unsubscribe myself from it, so I still have to bear with the many idiotic comments it gets. I've lost all interest in this issue, I have no intention of doing anything further to help get a proper fix into Debian or Ubuntu and thus don't really consider myself the libnatspec maintainer. People are of course free to grab my package but I won't be making any updates to it.