I see some of you have found the RC6 tunables test kernel I built. As a follow on to that I've been in touch with upstream and have pulled in a proposed patch which disables RC6p (deep RC6) for Sandy Bridge. Upstream claims that RC6p is what was responsible for the reports of hangs/graphics corruption issues when RC6 was enabled. I've then added a follow on patch to then enable plain RC6 by default for Sandy Bridge users. Both of these patches are available in the latest 3.2.0-17.26 kernel.
In order to help justify keeping these patches applied and providing Sandy Bridge users improved power savings by default (ie users will no longer need to pass in i915.i915_enable_rc6=1), I'd really appreciate if you could all review my call for testing which I posted to both the Ubuntu kernel-team and ubuntu-devel mailing lists:
Hi Everyone,
I see some of you have found the RC6 tunables test kernel I built. As a follow on to that I've been in touch with upstream and have pulled in a proposed patch which disables RC6p (deep RC6) for Sandy Bridge. Upstream claims that RC6p is what was responsible for the reports of hangs/graphics corruption issues when RC6 was enabled. I've then added a follow on patch to then enable plain RC6 by default for Sandy Bridge users. Both of these patches are available in the latest 3.2.0-17.26 kernel.
In order to help justify keeping these patches applied and providing Sandy Bridge users improved power savings by default (ie users will no longer need to pass in i915.i915_ enable_ rc6=1), I'd really appreciate if you could all review my call for testing which I posted to both the Ubuntu kernel-team and ubuntu-devel mailing lists:
https:/ /lists. ubuntu. com/archives/ kernel- team/2012- February/ 019029. html
If you could please test and provide your feedback on the PowerManagementRC6 wiki, I would greatly appreciate it.
https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Kernel/ PowerManagement RC6
Thanks in advance.