Comment 11 for bug 770679
Revision history for this message
| Ricardo Salveti (rsalveti) wrote Re: [Bug 770679] Re: Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C | #11 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Robert Nelson <email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> The kernel looks good on the "xM C"..
>
> ubuntu@omap:~$ lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:ec00 Standard Microsystems Corp.
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9514 Standard Microsystems Corp.
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> ubuntu@omap:~$ dmesg | grep Beagle
> [ 0.000000] Machine: OMAP3 Beagle Board
> [ 0.154510] OMAP3 Beagle Rev: xM C
> [ 4.019317] OMAP3 Beagle/Devkit8000 SoC init
> ubuntu@omap:~$ uname -a
> Linux omap 2.6.38-9-omap #43xmbc Tue Apr 26 02:54:23 BRT 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
Nice, thanks for testing it.
Interesting that it worked well for you, as described at the hardware
changes document (010). I wonder why Matt's board got 011, but good
now that newer boards should all behave as a xM rev C.