Well, just tried to install Karmic on the same Vaio VGN-SR21M, and here are the results.
Wakeups in the range of 20 - 30, while I thought that the 120 - 150 range was the norm.
It seems to me that the consumption level rised with Maverick, since I also tested a Lucid server that stays around 20 - 30 all the time.
Results are for the Vaio laptop.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
Well, just tried to install Karmic on the same Vaio VGN-SR21M, and here are the results.
Wakeups in the range of 20 - 30, while I thought that the 120 - 150 range was the norm.
It seems to me that the consumption level rised with Maverick, since I also tested a Lucid server that stays around 20 - 30 all the time.
Results are for the Vaio laptop.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) ( 0.0%) 2.27 Ghz 0.3%
polling 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 2.27 Ghz 0.1%
C1 mwait 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 1.60 Ghz 0.0%
C2 mwait 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 800 Mhz 99.6%
C3 mwait 47.0ms (100.0%)
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 21.4 interval: 15.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups: start_range_ ns (tick_sched_timer) poll_rh_ status (rh_timer_func) timer (neigh_ periodic_ timer)
23.1% ( 6.3) <kernel core> : hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
16.3% ( 4.5) <kernel core> : hrtimer_
14.6% ( 4.0) <kernel core> : usb_hcd_
12.9% ( 3.5) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
11.9% ( 3.3) <interrupt> : ahci
4.9% ( 1.3) <kernel core> : neigh_periodic_