With this kernel I'm still seeing faulty resume behavior as described for 2.6.38-3 in comment #15 (it enters suspend but fails to resume). However, I am able to switch to a VT when the system is working (i.e. before suspend). So it's probably not worth filing an upstream bug for the VT issue as I'll likely be told that it's been solved.
I could file an Ubuntu bug for the VT problem, as it's still present on the latest proposed Natty kernel (2.6.38-9) but NOT, as I mentioned, on mainline.
Let me know if it makes sense for me to do this to also keep track of the VT switching problem.
By the way, I tested with the latest mainline kernel as of today:
http:// kernel. ubuntu. com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/ daily/current/ linux-image- 2.6.39- 999-generic_ 2.6.39- 999.20110524090 5_i386. deb
With this kernel I'm still seeing faulty resume behavior as described for 2.6.38-3 in comment #15 (it enters suspend but fails to resume). However, I am able to switch to a VT when the system is working (i.e. before suspend). So it's probably not worth filing an upstream bug for the VT issue as I'll likely be told that it's been solved.
I could file an Ubuntu bug for the VT problem, as it's still present on the latest proposed Natty kernel (2.6.38-9) but NOT, as I mentioned, on mainline.
Let me know if it makes sense for me to do this to also keep track of the VT switching problem.