Whatever is going on, it's fairly widespread, and other people seem to see it: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131459136817352&w=2
Although, I do question if the bisect really found the cause, or this is just something spurious caused the bisect to point here.
With CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE=y *AND* intel_idle.max_cstate=0, the system consistently suspend/resumes 2.6.39.4.
With CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE=n, the system consistently suspend/resumes with 2.6.39.4.
IOW, intel_idle triggers the problem, except when disabled at compile or runtime. acpi_idle seems OK. I bet Windows uses ACPI and that's why nobody sees this on Windows.
Note: this is suspend/resume with Fn-F4, the lid, or from software. I can't get the "pull-down, then fiddle with the power button to resume" hack to work any more.
One little note from Debian:http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 635575# 42
> Debian kernels do not include the intel_idle driver.
Whatever is going on, it's fairly widespread, and other people seem to see it: marc.info/ ?l=linux- kernel& m=1314591368173 52&w=2
http://
Although, I do question if the bisect really found the cause, or this is just something spurious caused the bisect to point here.
We also know that the chipset is quirky: git.kernel. org/gitweb. cgi?p=linux/ kernel/ git/torvalds/ linux-2. 6.git;a= commit; h=4731fdcf6f7bd ab3e369a3f844d4 ea4d4017284d
http://
With CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE=y *AND* intel_idle. max_cstate= 0, the system consistently suspend/resumes 2.6.39.4. INTEL_IDLE= n, the system consistently suspend/resumes with 2.6.39.4.
With CONFIG_
IOW, intel_idle triggers the problem, except when disabled at compile or runtime. acpi_idle seems OK. I bet Windows uses ACPI and that's why nobody sees this on Windows.
Note: this is suspend/resume with Fn-F4, the lid, or from software. I can't get the "pull-down, then fiddle with the power button to resume" hack to work any more.