Comment 68 for bug 564376

Revision history for this message
dfme (dfme-sunrise) wrote :

I'm also affected by this bug. Running Ubuntu 10.04 on a MSI Wind 100
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic (i686)
Wireless: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8187SE Wireless LAN Controller (rev 22)
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

Wireless is fine until I stream a video from youtube (or any other flash sourced video). Then I loose complete connection to the internet even though network⁻manager says I'm connected via WLAN!

dmesg when I loose the connection:
[ 307.690113] Linking with AirBall: channel is 1
[ 307.708334] Associated successfully
[ 307.708342] Using G rates
[ 307.722944] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
[ 308.971059] CCMP: replay detected: STA=00:02:cf:ed:6c:48 previous PN 000000000000 received PN 000000000000
[ 318.176036] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
[ 599.762238] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.762798] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.764354] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.765121] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.765721] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.766631] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.766800] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.767411] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 599.768176] CCMP: received packet without ExtIV flag from 00:02:cf:ed:6c:48
[ 604.475443] Associated successfully
[ 604.475454] Using G rates
[ 604.791006] Associated successfully
[ 604.791018] Using G rates
[ 604.827629] Associated successfully
[ 604.827642] Using G rates
[ 605.161206] Associated successfully
[ 605.161217] Using G rates
[ 605.318319] Associated successfully
[ 605.318332] Using G rates
[ 605.403549] Associated successfully
[ 605.403566] Using G rates
[ 605.439384] Associated successfully
[ 605.439397] Using G rates
[ 605.475736] Associated successfully
[ 605.475747] Using G rates
[ 606.092092] Associated successfully

Any help would be appreciated... This bug is very annoying, and it seems to be regression, since with Ubuntu 9.10 I did not have these issues!