On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:47:11 -0700 (PDT) <email address hidden> wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27146 > > --- Comment #18 from Geir Ove Myhr <email address hidden> 2010-07-10 07:47:11 PDT --- > (In reply to comment #17) > > Because I know Jesse is this ->||<- close to getting this patch upstream. :) > > Last message on the intel-gfx mailing list [1] was that this patch is not > needed when the patch "drm/i915: cleanup lvds detection function" [2] is > applied. So I suppose it is patch [2] that we will see upstream soon. > > [1]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2010-July/007383.html > [2]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2010-July/007382.html
No, the cleanup function is separate. If you still see issues with current 2.6.35-rc and you need to apply the previous "disable unused" patch, then we have some other issue going on as well.
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
<email address hidden> wrote:
> https:/ /bugs.freedeskt op.org/ show_bug. cgi?id= 27146 lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ intel-gfx/ 2010-July/ 007383. html lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ intel-gfx/ 2010-July/ 007382. html
>
> --- Comment #18 from Geir Ove Myhr <email address hidden> 2010-07-10 07:47:11 PDT ---
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > Because I know Jesse is this ->||<- close to getting this patch upstream. :)
>
> Last message on the intel-gfx mailing list [1] was that this patch is not
> needed when the patch "drm/i915: cleanup lvds detection function" [2] is
> applied. So I suppose it is patch [2] that we will see upstream soon.
>
> [1]: http://
> [2]: http://
No, the cleanup function is separate. If you still see issues with
current 2.6.35-rc and you need to apply the previous "disable unused"
patch, then we have some other issue going on as well.