Comment 44 for bug 406466

<sahlberg1> tridge, jk that packet in the trace is infolevel 105 BUT it is encoded exactly the same as info level 104 (BOTH DIRECTORY Info), i.e. there is no new field here.
<sahlberg1> tridge, jk, this is either 0x104 and 0x105 are identical or a bug in the implementation in the server in this trace.
<jk> sahlberg1: it looks like the client has correctly parsed the response though, as it iterates through the directory contents...
<tridge> jk: each entry has a "next offset" ptr
<tridge> jk: so you can iterate, but you won't see the filenames
<tridge> jk: as the filename data will be at the wrong offset