npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #141613 reported by laga
This bug affects 3499 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nspluginwrapper (Mandriva)
Fix Released
Critical
nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Triaged
High
Unassigned
Declined for Dapper by Sebastien Bacher
Declined for Gutsy by Steve Langasek
Declined for Hardy by Steve Langasek
Declined for Intrepid by Steve Langasek
Declined for Jaunty by Brian Murray
Declined for Karmic by Sebastien Bacher
Declined for Lucid by Sebastien Bacher
Declined for Maverick by Sebastien Bacher

Bug Description

LATEST VERSION TESTED:
nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1

Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper

Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
ProcCwd: /home/laga
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
Stacktrace:
 #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
 #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xf6d5b2e8: cmpb $0x0,(%edx)
 PC (0xf6d5b2e8) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%edx)" (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA

Revision history for this message
laga (laga) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stack trace with source code
Revision history for this message
Juksu (jluostar) wrote :

As there are so many occurrences (duplicates), i think this bug is confirmed.

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Stas Sușcov (sushkov) wrote : Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

npviewer.bin related...
After updating to the adobe's non-free flash plugin... Several time I
had the following situation. I could not close a tab (it just freeze
my FF) until I kill the npviewer.bin process....

It directly affects the productivity of ff!!! Negatively!

--
  ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
    - against HTML email X
                      & vCards / \
http://stas.nerd.ro/ascii/

Revision history for this message
gururise (gururise) wrote :

I can confirm this bug. I am running 7.10 on AMD64 platform. Most of the crashes seemed to occur after upgrading to the latest flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.115.0

Firefox will usually not crash; however, npviewer.bin process will crash and consume 100% cpu on about 50% of flash websites.

This bug makes flash all but unusable on 64-bit Ubuntu platform.

Revision history for this message
Austin Lund (austin-lund) wrote :

This one is hard to reproduce I find. Does anyone have a website which reliably reproduces this?

If libflashplayer.so or npviewer.bin has a bug we will be reliant on the friendly people who produce this software (woo!! Go freedom!). Unless of course there is a workaround.

Revision history for this message
eric.rost (eric-rost) wrote :

I haven't had a recurrence of this bug in months (since I originally posted
it, I think). I haven't seen something reliably crash the flashplayer. Sorry
guys :)

On Jan 13, 2008 2:41 PM, Austin <email address hidden> wrote:

> This one is hard to reproduce I find. Does anyone have a website which
> reliably reproduces this?
>
> If libflashplayer.so or npviewer.bin has a bug we will be reliant on the
> friendly people who produce this software (woo!! Go freedom!). Unless
> of course there is a workaround.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>

--
The Propaganda Machine: Politics, Current Events, Opinion, and Controversy

http://mybabylon.homelinux.org/blog

Revision history for this message
gururise (gururise) wrote :

Still happens to me all the time, on just about any website with flash. Even the flash ads on http://www.slashdot.org sometimes cause npviewer.bin to crash.

Revision history for this message
gururise (gururise) wrote :

I've attached a screenshot of the npviewer.bin process windows hanging around on my desktop after a firefox crash. Also, the relevant line from 'top' is:

 PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
10150 gene 20 0 84956 17m 6964 S 198 0.4 3:50.01 npviewer.bin

Hope this helps someone track down the bug with npviewer.bin, as it makes firefox all but unusable on 64-bit systems

Revision history for this message
eric.rost (eric-rost) wrote :

Sorry that I can't help anymore, I think its been since a week after I
posted the bug that it disappeared off of my machine.

On Jan 25, 2008 12:18 PM, gururise <email address hidden> wrote:

> I've attached a screenshot of the npviewer.bin process windows hanging
> around on my desktop after a firefox crash. Also, the relevant line
> from 'top' is:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 10150 gene 20 0 84956 17m 6964 S 198 0.4 3:50.01 npviewer.bin
>
> Hope this helps someone track down the bug with npviewer.bin, as it
> makes firefox all but unusable on 64-bit systems
>
> ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of npviewer.bin after firefox crash"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11568981/Screenshot.png
>
> ** Tags added: npviewer npviewer.bin nspluginwrapper
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>

--
The Propaganda Machine: Politics, Current Events, Opinion, and Controversy

http://mybabylon.homelinux.org/blog

Revision history for this message
Austin Lund (austin-lund) wrote :

So the original report is due to a null pointer problem. %edx is zero so (%edx) is sure to cause problems.

Perhaps valgrind is in order, but being a hard to repeat bug..... might be a little annoying.

Anyone want to try:

valgrind --trace-children=yes --tool=memcheck firefox

??

(I have no idea if this will be useful).

Revision history for this message
gururise (gururise) wrote :

I ran valgrind --trace-children=yes --log-file-exactly=valgrind.txt --tool=memcheck /usr/bin/firefox

I have attached the log file to this post. The website I visited, that sometimes doesnt work with flash (but doesn't necessarily cause npviewer.bin to crash) is: http://www.flasharcade.com/skill-games/paris-hilton-jail-escape-game.html

The following error messages appeared on the shell while valgrind was running:
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NP_Initialize() invoke: Connection was NULL
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.

Revision history for this message
mabovo (mabovo) wrote :

My two cups contribution.

Revision history for this message
Jussi M. (vernerim) wrote :

Ramdom crashes of npviewer.bin also occur on Hardy. This time I was at http://www.itwire.com/content/view/16309/1148/. Has also occured with flash content at www.mtv3.fi.

firefox-3.0:
  Installed: 3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
nspluginwrapper:
  Installed: 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1

Greetings,
Jussi M.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Boden (jeremyboden) wrote :

I was playing a downloaded video in Miro - happened after about a minute.
Firefox was loaded but not active.

Revision history for this message
Austin Lund (austin-lund) wrote :

Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?

It appears there is a potentially fix package for 8.04, but not for 7.10 at the moment.

Revision history for this message
hlhcomms (hlhcomms) wrote :

It coould be a duplicate... the screen turns grayscale while watching
video content via Firefox, then returns to colour after avariable
interlude. I can live with this problem for now, so I'll wait for 8.04.

Austin wrote:
> Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?
>
> It appears there is a potentially fix package for 8.04, but not for 7.10
> at the moment.
>
>

Revision history for this message
Mateusz (mateusz-kaduk) wrote :

I dont use ubuntu anymore, sorry
btw, macromedia swf plugin just works fine with flash on 64bit systems.

2008/3/7, hlhcomms <email address hidden>:
>
> It coould be a duplicate... the screen turns grayscale while watching
> video content via Firefox, then returns to colour after avariable
> interlude. I can live with this problem for now, so I'll wait for 8.04.
>
>
> Austin wrote:
> > Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?
> >
> > It appears there is a potentially fix package for 8.04, but not for 7.10
> > at the moment.
> >
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
alanpdodd (alan-dodd) wrote :

This may be a duplicate, however I am HH Alpha 5, latest updates when this
happened. Now on A6.

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Austin <email address hidden> wrote:

> Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?
>
> It appears there is a potentially fix package for 8.04, but not for 7.10
> at the moment.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Ken Foskey (foskey) wrote :

I have Ubuntu 8.04 - the Hardy Heron - released in April 2008.

npviewer crashes regularly for me right now. It works but is not stable. It appears that if a single page has many flash elements then it will crash. Some of those joke sites with lots of adds will crash it.

I have Ubuntu with proprietary Nvidia drivers I went 8.04 because I have a new nvidia card.

Revision history for this message
aberlanas (angel-berlanas) wrote :

I'm in the same situation that waratah.

Revision history for this message
Scott Wegner (swegner) wrote :

I got this crash directly after upgrading to Hardy alpha from Gutsy. x64 processor.

Revision history for this message
Austin Lund (austin-lund) wrote :

Does the link in the bug report fix this for anyone here?

It worked for me.

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12234800/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb

Revision history for this message
Dara Adib (daradib) wrote :

Can someone clarify if Bug 193811 is a duplicate of this bug?

Revision history for this message
Noel J. Bergman (noeljb) wrote :

I've marked my report, Bug 193811, as a duplicate. And I reiterate what I said in Bug 179882, also marked as a duplicate of this, that the replacement package, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12234800/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb, fixes it for me.

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
Download full text (4.7 KiB)

1) I have the same crashes of npviewer.bin.
2) When I try to install the nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb, that install itself goes wrong. See below.

Platform: Ubuntu 8.04 AMD64 Alpha upgraded, running on an Athlon X2 3600+

Tips?

sander@ubuntu-804:~$ locate npviewer
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/noarch/npviewer
/var/crash/_usr_lib_nspluginwrapper_i386_linux_npviewer.bin.1000.crash

sander@ubuntu-804:~$ ll /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 107016 2008-02-26 17:05 /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
sander@ubuntu-804:~$

sander@ubuntu-804:~$ sudo dpkg -i Desktop/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb
*** glibc detected *** sudo: free(): invalid pointer: 0x00007f3499da36c8 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7f34995d2fca]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x7f34995d6b5c]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_dlsym+0x80)[0x7f349966cfc0]
/lib/libc.so.6(__nss_lookup_function+0x16a)[0x7f3499646e6a]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7f349961e939]
/lib/libc.so.6(getaddrinfo+0x1be)[0x7f349962029e]
sudo[0x407c49]
sudo[0x408c4d]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x7f349957d0b4]
sudo[0x4033a9]
======= Memory map: ========
00400000-0041c000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 307070 /usr/bin/sudo
0061b000-0061e000 rw-p 0001b000 08:05 307070 /usr/bin/sudo
0061e000-00641000 rw-p 0061e000 00:00 0 [heap]
7f3498b18000-7f3498b25000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7f3498b25000-7f3498d25000 ---p 0000d000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7f3498d25000-7f3498d26000 rw-p 0000d000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7f3498d26000-7f3498d30000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7f3498d30000-7f3498f30000 ---p 0000a000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7f3498f30000-7f3498f32000 rw-p 0000a000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7f3498f32000-7f3498f3c000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7f3498f3c000-7f349913b000 ---p 0000a000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7f349913b000-7f349913d000 rw-p 00009000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7f349913d000-7f3499153000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7f3499153000-7f3499352000 ---p 00016000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7f3499352000-7f3499354000 rw-p 00015000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7f3499354000-7f3499356000 rw-p 7f3499354000 00:00 0
7f3499356000-7f349935e000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7f349935e000-7f349955d000 ---p 00008000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7f349955d000-7f349955f000 rw-p 00007000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7f349955f000-7f34996b7000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7f34996b7000-7f34998b7000 ---p 00158000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7f34998b7000-7f...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
Download full text (4.2 KiB)

Never mind my last post; I get the same error message when trying to install another package, so the install error message is probably not related to npviewer.bin. Probably time for a fresh install of Hardy Heron Alpha.

sander@ubuntu-804:~$ sudo apt-get install clutch
*** glibc detected *** sudo: free(): invalid pointer: 0x00007fe8288b76c8 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7fe8280e6fca]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x7fe8280eab5c]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_dlsym+0x80)[0x7fe828180fc0]
/lib/libc.so.6(__nss_lookup_function+0x16a)[0x7fe82815ae6a]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7fe828132939]
/lib/libc.so.6(getaddrinfo+0x1be)[0x7fe82813429e]
sudo[0x407c49]
sudo[0x408c4d]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x7fe8280910b4]
sudo[0x4033a9]
======= Memory map: ========
00400000-0041c000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 307070 /usr/bin/sudo
0061b000-0061e000 rw-p 0001b000 08:05 307070 /usr/bin/sudo
0061e000-00641000 rw-p 0061e000 00:00 0 [heap]
7fe82762c000-7fe827639000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7fe827639000-7fe827839000 ---p 0000d000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7fe827839000-7fe82783a000 rw-p 0000d000 08:05 50997 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
7fe82783a000-7fe827844000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7fe827844000-7fe827a44000 ---p 0000a000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7fe827a44000-7fe827a46000 rw-p 0000a000 08:05 49001 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so
7fe827a46000-7fe827a50000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7fe827a50000-7fe827c4f000 ---p 0000a000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7fe827c4f000-7fe827c51000 rw-p 00009000 08:05 49003 /lib/libnss_nis-2.7.so
7fe827c51000-7fe827c67000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7fe827c67000-7fe827e66000 ---p 00016000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7fe827e66000-7fe827e68000 rw-p 00015000 08:05 48994 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so
7fe827e68000-7fe827e6a000 rw-p 7fe827e68000 00:00 0
7fe827e6a000-7fe827e72000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7fe827e72000-7fe828071000 ---p 00008000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7fe828071000-7fe828073000 rw-p 00007000 08:05 48995 /lib/libnss_compat-2.7.so
7fe828073000-7fe8281cb000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7fe8281cb000-7fe8283cb000 ---p 00158000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7fe8283cb000-7fe8283ce000 r--p 00158000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7fe8283ce000-7fe8283d0000 rw-p 0015b000 08:05 48988 /lib/libc-2.7.so
7fe8283d0000-7fe8283d5000 rw-p 7fe8283d0000 00:00 0
7fe8283d5000-7fe8283d7000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 48991 /lib/libdl-2.7.so
7fe8283d7000-7fe8285d7000 ---p 00002000 08:05 48991 /lib/libdl-2.7.so
7fe8285d7000-7fe8285d9000 rw-p 00002000 08:05 48991 /lib/libdl-2.7.so
7fe8285...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Nat Tuck (nat-ferrus) wrote :

Hardy's still doing this.

Revision history for this message
bill wood (wlwood3) wrote :

> I've marked my report, Bug 193811, as a duplicate. And I reiterate what I said in Bug 179882,
> also marked as a duplicate of this, that the replacement package,
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12234800/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb, fixes it for me.

I tried this in Gutsy, and I get the following:

bill@bill-laptop:~$ sudo dpkg -i Desktop/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb
[sudo] password for bill:
(Reading database ... 104764 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1 (using .../nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement nspluginwrapper ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of nspluginwrapper:
 nspluginwrapper depends on libc6 (>= 2.7-1); however:
  Version of libc6 on system is 2.6.1-1ubuntu10.
 nspluginwrapper depends on libc6-i386 (>= 2.7-1); however:
  Version of libc6-i386 on system is 2.6.1-1ubuntu10.
dpkg: error processing nspluginwrapper (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 nspluginwrapper

I checked Synaptic, and it shows 2.6.1-1ubuntu10 is the most current version of libc6.

Are you using Hardy? Does it come with a newer libc6? Is there a way to install that in Gutsy?

Thanks.

Bill

Revision history for this message
icejoe (thisisicejoe) wrote :
Download full text (3.7 KiB)

yes i am using hardy, and yes the version installed with synaptic is
2.7-9ubuntu2. I'm going to take a guess and say that a way you could install
it in gutsy is to either go compile from source or add "
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu/ hardy main" as a repository and just find
it from there ( though it may request you install other things as
dependencies.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:58 AM, bill wood <email address hidden> wrote:

> > I've marked my report, Bug 193811, as a duplicate. And I reiterate what
> I said in Bug 179882,
> > also marked as a duplicate of this, that the replacement package,
> >
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12234800/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb,
> fixes it for me.
>
> I tried this in Gutsy, and I get the following:
>
> bill@bill-laptop:~$ sudo dpkg -i
> Desktop/nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb
> [sudo] password for bill:
> (Reading database ... 104764 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1 (using
> .../nspluginwrapper_0.9.91.5-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement nspluginwrapper ...
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of nspluginwrapper:
> nspluginwrapper depends on libc6 (>= 2.7-1); however:
> Version of libc6 on system is 2.6.1-1ubuntu10.
> nspluginwrapper depends on libc6-i386 (>= 2.7-1); however:
> Version of libc6-i386 on system is 2.6.1-1ubuntu10.
> dpkg: error processing nspluginwrapper (--install):
> dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> nspluginwrapper
>
> I checked Synaptic, and it shows 2.6.1-1ubuntu10 is the most current
> version of libc6.
>
> Are you using Hardy? Does it come with a newer libc6? Is there a way to
> install that in Gutsy?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bill
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf709...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
bill wood (wlwood3) wrote :

I found a post here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/177856
that seems to have cured the problem for me.

It involves installing this version of the nsplugin wrapper file:

Revision history for this message
Mrts (mrts) wrote :

Confirming that the updated package fixes this for me.

Revision history for this message
Nico Bauer (oshelpdesk) wrote :

still the same problem for me.

Revision history for this message
<hp> (hplorenzana) wrote :

I've been encountering this since Gutsy. I just installed Hardy. I can sometimes get this through clicking on an HTML email from Evolution (Ad) and it opens FF.

Revision history for this message
James Clemence (jvc26) wrote :

Not much to say other than like the OP simply was informed of the crash. Running Hardy 8.04 beta, amd64. Any further information do ask,

Il

Revision history for this message
phenest (steve-clark) wrote :

I can confirm that this is now working in Hardy Heron AMD64.

Revision history for this message
phenest (steve-clark) wrote :

My apologies. Ignore last comment. Commented on wrong bug. (Maybe someone can delete it?)

Revision history for this message
Joel Wirāmu Pauling (aenertia) (aenertia) wrote :

This bug is a bit more severe on laptops. Because it puts continual background strain on processors it leads to very high running temps but otherwise a responsive system. users who are unaware of the problem risk hardware failure or at least decrease lifetime.

For example on my core2 7400 it will cause a proc that runs normally around the 50C mark to sit at 60-70C and sometimes rise to 80C this will cause battery, harddrive and other component to have signf shorter lifetimes.

Revision history for this message
Ricardo Alvarado (killincho) wrote :

The same problem affects the GNOME version of Mandriva 2008.1 RC.2

See:

https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=39264

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :

I don't know if this is the same bug but flash seems to eat a lot of cpu on my computer too, whithout affecting too much the responsiveness of the system, even if the browser window is minimized. I use Hardy on a core 2 duo laptop.

Revision history for this message
Dara Adib (daradib) wrote :

Jim Braux-Zin: maybe your issue is related to Bug 113184?

Revision history for this message
borisattva (borisattva) wrote :

it might be, several possible matches came up and i linked it to the one
that had an exact matching subject.
i'm not a programmer so i cant provide any more insight other than what the
crash reporter generated

On 4/5/08, Cyrus Jones <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Jim Braux-Zin: maybe your issue is related to Bug 113184?
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :

Indeed going to http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/ (link submitted in Bug 113184) make my npviewer.bin crash.

Revision history for this message
Danny Wood (danwood76) wrote :

With the latest version of firefox 3 (Hardy repositories) on AMD64 my viewer no longer crashes.
Going to the site mentioned above left npviewer running fine and I could watch the video on there.

Revision history for this message
Danny Wood (danwood76) wrote :

Forget what I just said.
It crashed when I closed that tab, thought doesn't do it every time.
I just had all the videos playing on that site and closed the tab and re opened it and closed it again without it crashing.

Revision history for this message
Nico Bauer (oshelpdesk) wrote :

still the same problem for me too. just visited a website with flash and it crashed twice without doing anything.

Revision history for this message
Tomáš Frýda (fryda.tomas) wrote :

With the latest version of Firefox (3 beta 5) on Intel(R) EM64T (Core 2 Quad)
everything is all right. No further crashes related to Firefox or npviewer.

2008/4/6, McKinney <email address hidden>:
>
> still the same problem for me too. just visited a website with flash and
> it crashed twice without doing anything.
>
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Juksu (jluostar) wrote :

Unlike Tomas Fryda, I am still getting these crashes With Firefox-3.0b5

Revision history for this message
Lazlo (lazlo-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Still the same problem here, crashed when viewing Google Analytics. Ruuning FF-3.0b5 on Hardy AMD64 radeon x1300 (fglrx).

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :

Actually, I am getting more and more crashes since the last update. It usually crashes after several minutes, whatever site I visit.

Revision history for this message
Tomáš Frýda (fryda.tomas) wrote :

I've just realized that I am using realtime kernel (uname -a: Linux
tomas-desktop 2.6.24-15-rt #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Apr 4 04:31:40 UTC 2008
x86_64 GNU/Linux) since yesterday... And now I am running FF for more than 4
hours still no errors and I am viewing multiple pages with flash (
youtube.com, video.google.com, matrixsynth.blogspot.com etc...) My graphic
card is nVidia GeForce 8600 GT (rev a1) so I am using non-free drivers.

2008/4/6, Jim Braux-Zin <email address hidden>:
>
> Actually, I am getting more and more crashes since the last update. It
> usually crashes after several minutes, whatever site I visit.
>
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Dara Adib (daradib) wrote :

Tomas Fryda: See bug 204574

Revision history for this message
Giuseppe Pennisi (giupenni78) wrote :

I realized that the problem can be reproduced when I closed one page that use flash and in the same moment I already opened another flash page.

gp

Revision history for this message
Dara Adib (daradib) wrote :

Peppe P.: do you have an SMP system (multiprocessor,multicore,etc.)?

Revision history for this message
Majord51 (majord51) wrote :

Cyrus Jones wrote:
> Peppe P.: do you have an SMP system (multiprocessor,multicore,etc.)?
>
>
Yes, I have an AMD Turion 64 x2 in an HP laptop.

Revision history for this message
Majord51 (majord51) wrote :

Juksu wrote:
> Unlike Tomas Fryda, I am still getting these crashes With Firefox-3.0b5
>
>
I had stopped getting these crashes for a while, but they started up
again today after updating.

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (628 bytes, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Majord51 <email address hidden> wrote:

> Juksu wrote:
> > Unlike Tomas Fryda, I am still getting these crashes With Firefox-3.0b5
> >
> >
> I had stopped getting these crashes for a while, but they started up
> again today after updating.

Same here: the crashed have started again.

Revision history for this message
Giuseppe Pennisi (giupenni78) wrote :

Cyrus Jones wrote:

>Peppe P.: do you have an SMP system (multiprocessor,multicore,etc.)?

Ops, sorry for my incomplete information. I have Intel DualCore E6750. I used Ubuntu 64 bit Hardy.
Two days ago (5 April) I didn't have this problem.

gp

Revision history for this message
The Fold (stuart-luscombe) wrote :

I got this error when I went to screwattack.com, presumably when it tried to load the revver flash player??

Revision history for this message
Brian Pitts (bpitts) wrote :

If flash crashed, would this cause npviewer.bin to crash?

Revision history for this message
PrivateUser132781 (privateuser132781-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel Core 2 Duo SMP system. Is this problem specific to amd64 systems with more than one core?

Revision history for this message
itsanudae (itsanudae) wrote :

Yeah, let me give you some details about my system upgrade

I have Xubuntu 7.10 Gutsy amd64 dualcore. I upgraded to all the stable Gutsy
updates. I upgraded Xfce to 4.4.2 via the Xubuntu Team PPA's. Then I decided
to help out the Phatch project, and Upgraded to Ubuntu (not Xubuntu) amd64
dualcore via the Ubuntu 8.04 alternate CD...

It just... offered to do a distribution upgrade, so I let it. I'm having
wierd issues. Immediately after upgrading I got this SIGSEGV npviewer.bin
crash.

Did I go about upgrading incorrectly? I am still a n00b.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Eduard Grebe <email address hidden> wrote:

> I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel Core 2 Duo SMP
> system. Is this problem specific to amd64 systems with more than one
> core?
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

--
-------------
itsanudae

Revision history for this message
joe williams (joetify) wrote :

I am running Core 2 Duo as well :

[zeusfaber@der-dieb ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
...

Eduard Grebe wrote:
> I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel Core 2 Duo SMP
> system. Is this problem specific to amd64 systems with more than one
> core?
>
>

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
MrRick (bigg1013) wrote :

My situation occurred with an AMD64 dual core when trying to upgrade from gutsy to hardy.

----- Original Message ----
From: joe williams <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:40:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

I am running Core 2 Duo as well :

[zeusfaber@der-dieb ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
...

Eduard Grebe wrote:
> I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel Core 2 Duo SMP
> system. Is this problem specific to amd64 systems with more than one
> core?
>
>

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: <email address hidden>

--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Revision history for this message
itsanudae (itsanudae) wrote :
Download full text (3.2 KiB)

ah, so I'm not the only one. Did you have a freaky setup like mine, or were
you using the GNOME desktop? I'm on Xfce.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:27 AM, MrRick <email address hidden> wrote:

> My situation occurred with an AMD64 dual core when trying to upgrade
> from gutsy to hardy.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: joe williams <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:40:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>
> I am running Core 2 Duo as well :
>
> [zeusfaber@der-dieb ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
> ...
>
>
> Eduard Grebe wrote:
> > I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel Core 2 Duo SMP
> > system. Is this problem specific to amd64 systems with more than one
> > core?
> >
> >
>
> --
> Name: Joseph A. Williams
> Email: <email address hidden>
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom ...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :

It seems fixed for me since the last bunch of upgrades on Hardy. I get no more crashes when I close a tab with flash content or when I go to http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/ .

Are you still experiencing this issue?

Revision history for this message
Ludwig (lvb2k2) wrote :

Hardy updated as of now, and still getting npviewer crashes on amd64. Random crashes when loading youtube pages. a royal pain.

Revision history for this message
itsanudae (itsanudae) wrote :

I will go and check on my Hardy box and let you know. Thanks for the info
Jim

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Jim Braux-Zin <email address hidden> wrote:

> It seems fixed for me since the last bunch of upgrades on Hardy. I get
> no more crashes when I close a tab with flash content or when I go to
> http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/ .
>
> Are you still experiencing this issue?
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

--
-------------
itsanudae

Revision history for this message
John Vivirito (gnomefreak) wrote :

Anyone still seeing this crash please report the crash using apport and keep each crash report on a seperate bug report. It seems we have more than one issue on the report and noone obtained a crash report from apport or in /var/crash. We can only handle one crash per bug report.

Revision history for this message
John Vivirito (gnomefreak) wrote :

Please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs on what to do with crashes, but still only one crash per bug report, apport will than mark it as a duplicate if it sees one.

Revision history for this message
itsanudae (itsanudae) wrote :

Thanks

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:45 AM, John Vivirito <email address hidden> wrote:

> Please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs on what to do with
> crashes, but still only one crash per bug report, apport will than mark
> it as a duplicate if it sees one.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Source Package "nspluginwrapper" in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

--
-------------
itsanudae

Revision history for this message
Richard Craig (richard1gb) wrote :

I was open a page which had to use flash, Firefox froze and when it did a top:

7002 richard 25 0 68132 15m 8352 R 100 0.4 1:42.01 npviewer.bin

killall npviewer.bin and Firefox was working, flash video not playing.

seems like a problem with flash

Linux ubuntu2131 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 02:46:46 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ii flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.124.0ubuntu1~gutsy1

Revision history for this message
Danny Wood (danwood76) wrote :

I've found that as long as flash videos aren't playing when I close their tabs nspluginwrapper doesnt crash.
I think its a bug where the stream is still open when firefox wants to close it but its not exiting properly, pausing or stopping flash videos seems to stop this from happening.

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (2.2 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

John,

As described on the page you gave, I tried to install firefox-dbg, but I got
an error (see below). Looking further, "firefox-2-dbg" does exist, but will
also install firefox-2, which I don't want. "firefox-3-dbg" does not exist.

Tips how to proceed?

Sander

sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-dbg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package firefox-dbg

sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-3-dbg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package firefox-3-dbg

sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-2-dbg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  firefox-2
Suggested packages:
  firefox-2-gnome-support latex-xft-fonts
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  firefox-2 firefox-2-dbg
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 60.4MB of archives.
After this operation, 183MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
Abort.
sander@ubuntu804:~$

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, John Vivirito <email address hidden> wrote:

> Please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs on what to do with
> crashes, but still only one crash per bug report, apport will than mark
> it as a duplicate if it sees one.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (4.8 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)
Download full text (3.8 KiB)

PS:

By running "firefox -g 2>&1 | tee ~/Desktop/gdb-firefox.log" without having
installed firefox-dbg, I already get some output:

sander@ubuntu804:~$ firefox -g 2>&1 | tee ~/Desktop/gdb-firefox.log
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetMIMEDescription
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetMIMEDescription return
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue: returning plugin name.
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue return
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue: returning plugin description.
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x622910: NP_GetValue return
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsdsp.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libartsc.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_style_detach: assertion
`style->attach_count > 0' failed

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_hide: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_hide: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

(npviewer.bin:7196): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Sander Jonkers - GMX <email address hidden>
wrote:

> John,
>
> As described on the page you gave, I tried to install firefox-dbg, but I
> got an error (see below). Looking further, "firefox-2-dbg" does exist, but
> will also install firefox-2, which I don't want. "firefox-3-dbg" does not
> exist.
>
> Tips how to proceed?
>
> Sander
>
>
> sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-dbg
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> E: Couldn't find package firefox-dbg
>
> sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-3-dbg
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> E: Couldn't find package firefox-3-dbg
>
> sander@ubuntu804:~$ sudo apt-get install firefox-2-dbg
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> firefox-2
> Suggested packages:
> firefox-2-gnome-support latex-xft-fonts
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> firefox-2 firefox-2-dbg
> 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not ...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Ludwig (lvb2k2) wrote :

still crashing with hardy fully updated as of now, when leaving nytimes.com page (following an external link)

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (1015 bytes, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

Ludwig,

Can you reproduce the crash? Because I tried, I don't see anything happening
when visiting, moving-away-from and/or closing nytimes.com

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Ludwig <email address hidden> wrote:

> still crashing with hardy fully updated as of now, when leaving
> nytimes.com page (following an external link)
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

This bug is still present on Hardy Heron release with nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-2ubuntu2. Importance should be set to high; just look at the giant number of duplicates and subscribers!

Revision history for this message
Ken Foskey (foskey) wrote :

I will add that on AMD-64 Nvidia setup that this bug does exist however it is not happening that often.

Revision history for this message
Manca (manca1) wrote :

I can confirm that this bug exists on Hard x64 and it's sooooo annoying! Opening couple of flash sites crash npviewer immediately !

And I am running Inte Quad core CPU!

Revision history for this message
Arvind (arvindkhadri) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (1.1 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

Am running the same...AMD64 but the crashes have stopped...which kernel
version are you running...I guess its been rectified in the 2.6.xx.17
version... check it out :)

2008/5/26 Manca <email address hidden>:

> I can confirm that this bug exists on Hard x64 and it's sooooo annoying!
> Opening couple of flash sites crash npviewer immediately !
>
> And I am running Inte Quad core CPU!
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
My Fingerprint:1024D/45CA88FF

The box said Windoze or better,so i installed Linux
Registered Linux User #46760

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

This bug has not been fixed. It is present in up-to-date Hardy.

$ uname -r
2.6.24-17-generic

Revision history for this message
Manca (manca1) wrote :

I am running: 2.6.24-16-generic

But if what Hewus says it's true then it is still a problem even in newer kernel!

Revision history for this message
Sander Jonkers (jonkers) wrote :

Same here: since the beginning of April 2008 I haven't seen any
npviewer.bin-crashes anymore.

Sander

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:26 PM, arvind <email address hidden> wrote:
> Am running the same...AMD64 but the crashes have stopped...which kernel
> version are you running...I guess its been rectified in the 2.6.xx.17
> version... check it out :)
>
> 2008/5/26 Manca <email address hidden>:
>
>> I can confirm that this bug exists on Hard x64 and it's sooooo annoying!
>> Opening couple of flash sites crash npviewer immediately !
>>
>> And I am running Inte Quad core CPU!
>>
>> --
>> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>
> --
> My Fingerprint:1024D/45CA88FF
>
> The box said Windoze or better,so i installed Linux
> Registered Linux User #46760
>
>
> ** Attachment added: "unnamed"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14712960/unnamed
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Arvind (arvindkhadri) wrote :
  • unnamed Edit (2.6 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

hey i cant go to full screen mode on youtube...no crash reports
too...strange...
2008/5/26 Sander Jonkers <email address hidden>:

> Same here: since the beginning of April 2008 I haven't seen any
> npviewer.bin-crashes anymore.
>
> Sander
>
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:26 PM, arvind <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Am running the same...AMD64 but the crashes have stopped...which kernel
> > version are you running...I guess its been rectified in the 2.6.xx.17
> > version... check it out :)
> >
> > 2008/5/26 Manca <email address hidden>:
> >
> >> I can confirm that this bug exists on Hard x64 and it's sooooo annoying!
> >> Opening couple of flash sites crash npviewer immediately !
> >>
> >> And I am running Inte Quad core CPU!
> >>
> >> --
> >> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> >> of the bug.
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > My Fingerprint:1024D/45CA88FF
> >
> > The box said Windoze or better,so i installed Linux
> > Registered Linux User #46760
> >
> >
> > ** Attachment added: "unnamed"
> > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14712960/unnamed
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
My Fingerprint:1024D/45CA88FF

The box said Windoze or better,so i installed Linux
Registered Linux User #46760

Revision history for this message
Erlenmayr (erlenmayr) wrote : FlashBlock causes nspluginwrapper crashes too

While I have FlashBlock (the Firefox addon) enabled, YouTube videos crash, when I open other websites using flash (which are blocked by the addon on the new sites) in new tabs.

I used FlashBlock for a longer time. Since I disabled it a few days ago there were no more crashes (especially "grey screens") of flash or nspluginwrapper. Maybe a lot of crashes on your machine are caused by FlashBlock, too.

Additional Information:
I am using Hardy (8.04) 64 bit (Core 2 Duo) with Firefox 3 Beta 5.

Revision history for this message
Manca (manca1) wrote :

I am not using FlashBlock at all.

The problem just exists, and it is definitely connected to bad coding in either nviewer wrapper or in flash itself!

BUMP FOR FIX!!

Revision history for this message
Dan Taylor (slash) wrote :

I'm also on Hardy 8.04 64-bit (core 2 duo) with firefox 3 beta 5. The crashes with npviewer.bin for me have stopped shortly before Hardy final was released, However, after having many tabs open (with a fair amount with flash embedded pages having been surfed), I do get the embedded "gray box" issue on new pages that I try to load up. Completely closing and restarting the browser fixes it temporarily until many embedded pages have been opened again...
FWIW, I also tried Flash Player 10 beta (http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html) and overwrote the libflashplayer.so with the beta version to see if that helped at all, but it still has the same issue, which leads me to suspect it's an issue with npviewer.bin

Revision history for this message
Dan Taylor (slash) wrote :

Correction, I meant the wrapper in general, not npviewer.bin specifically.

Revision history for this message
perpetualrabbit (perpetualrabbit) wrote : npviewer bug

Hi all,

about this npviewer bug:

I run hardy x86_64, and I see the same bug when using the wrapper around
acroread. So I have a 64 bit browser and use acroread in it. It is
usable, but after I close a tab with acroread in it, npviewer apparantly
is not closed and starts using 100% cpu in the background.
Well: 100% cpu on one core in my case.

I have to manually kill those npviewer.bin processes all the time.

It definitely is a bug and not fixed yet.

Revision history for this message
Lars Kumbier (derlars) wrote : Re: [Bug 141613] FlashBlock causes nspluginwrapper crashes too

I can confirm the grey-screens in combination with the Adobe Flash
Plugin. I do not use flashblock, but adblock plus.

Did anyone find a way to reproduce the problem with a site or
combination of sites yet?

Am Montag, den 26.05.2008, 20:21 +0000 schrieb Erlenmayr:
> While I have FlashBlock (the Firefox addon) enabled, YouTube videos
> crash, when I open other websites using flash (which are blocked by the
> addon on the new sites) in new tabs.
>
> I used FlashBlock for a longer time. Since I disabled it a few days ago
> there were no more crashes (especially "grey screens") of flash or
> nspluginwrapper. Maybe a lot of crashes on your machine are caused by
> FlashBlock, too.
>
>
> Additional Information:
> I am using Hardy (8.04) 64 bit (Core 2 Duo) with Firefox 3 Beta 5.
>

Revision history for this message
Patrick Brueckner (madmuffin) wrote :

I have that problem on 8.04 since i got my new notebook (with amd64 cpu).
i don't see a correlation with any other plugin installed since that problem appeared before installing any plugin too.

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Still exists on Intrepid. Has a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users - setting to high importance.

nspluginwrapper/intrepid uptodate 0.9.91.5-2ubuntu2
flashplugin-nonfree/intrepid uptodate 10.0.1.218+10.0.0.525ubuntu1

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
importance: Undecided → High
Revision history for this message
Sami Nybacka (sapeny) wrote :

Had same problem: when trying to use Adobe Connect Pro flash application with firefox (2 or 3), flash got stuck, and after closing browser window, npviewer.bin started to go wild, using all CPU time (had to kill it).

But today, I installed lib32nss-mdns package, and after that flash started to work!

Package: nspluginwrapper
Architecture: amd64
Version: 0.9.91.5-2ubuntu2

Package: lib32nss-mdns
Architecture: amd64
Version: 0.10-3ubuntu2

Revision history for this message
Patrick Brueckner (madmuffin) wrote :

@Sami Nybacka:

I had lib32nss-mdns installed forever and this problem still applies.

Revision history for this message
Nizar Kerkeni (nizarus) wrote :

got this bug on intrepid amd64 after system update (08 07 2008)

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Nizar: Don't attach .crash files; you should only submit them using apport, and one has already been submitted here. I have removed the file.

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Hope this stacktrace proves useful.

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Kraemer (djkraemer) wrote :

Confirming on Intrepid alpha 4 amd64

Revision history for this message
Solid (the-solid-boss-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

Actually, hardy heron.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Kraemer <email address hidden>wrote:

> Confirming on Intrepid alpha 4 amd64
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Kraemer (djkraemer) wrote :

No, I actually knew exactly what i was saying. i can't confirm it on Hardy because i'm not using Hardy. I'm using Intrepid alpha 4.

This bug has seen two different releases now and might see a third. There are reports from the two previous releases and nominations to have them fixed for Intrepid. Why would I start begin a new report after noticing this?

I'm fully aware of what distro i'm using.

Thanks

Revision history for this message
Salvador Velázquez de la Cruz (salvador-vc) wrote :

same here, intrepid alpha 4 amd64, my only tab was gmail

kernel: 2.6.26-5-generic
GNOME: 2.23.90
nspluginwrapper: 0.9.91.5-2ubuntu2

Revision history for this message
Felipe De la Puente (fdelapuente) wrote :

The Same here with Intrepid, 2.6.27-2 kernel, and so on. And also take a look at this screenshot, weird windows are opened when I leave websites with flash sections, and when you close any of them, firefox crashes.

Greetings, Felipe.

Revision history for this message
Miia Sample (myrtti) wrote :

I've got a similar issue EVEN without nspluginwrapper installed, using swfdec and epiphany.
Only disabling flash altogether removes the problem.

It's filed as a separete bug (now marked duplicate of this)
as https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/262362

Revision history for this message
D. Grady (fehknt) wrote :

I'm on Intrepid 64... 2.6.27-2. The strange part is... I didn't have this problem on Hardy. Something changed when I ran the dist-upgrade. I am not visiting any sites that I didn't before. The only thing that I can think of is that there definitely was a new version of the flash player installed. I'll try to remember and remove the nonfree flash and test it with the free version and or pin down a specific website. I suspect that it's google calendar but I'm not sure, I'll have to play with my sessions (I have a large number of saved tabs currently and I need to organize them before closing them).

Revision history for this message
Felipe De la Puente (fdelapuente) wrote :

At least, since a couple of days, The strange pop-up windows have
disappeared, Still without flash, but now surfing on the net is relatively
normal(regardless of the lack of flash animations).

Greetings, Felipe.

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:07 AM, D. Grady <email address hidden> wrote:

> I'm on Intrepid 64... 2.6.27-2. The strange part is... I didn't have
> this problem on Hardy. Something changed when I ran the dist-upgrade.
> I am not visiting any sites that I didn't before. The only thing that I
> can think of is that there definitely was a new version of the flash
> player installed. I'll try to remember and remove the nonfree flash and
> test it with the free version and or pin down a specific website. I
> suspect that it's google calendar but I'm not sure, I'll have to play
> with my sessions (I have a large number of saved tabs currently and I
> need to organize them before closing them).
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
ATTE:
Hernán Felipe De la Puente Christen
Móvil : 93199807
ICQ : 58547127
MSN/Google Talk : <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
D. Grady (fehknt) wrote :

I can confirm that changing from the nonfree flash to the combination of libswfdec-0.7.4-1 and swfdec-mozilla-0.7.4-2-ubuntu1 did fix the problem for me as well as speeding up firefox when dealing with flash websites. I purged flashplugin-nonfree. Can anyone else confirm that this fixes the problem?

Revision history for this message
Tessa (unit3) wrote :

Well, that's not really a fix. You're replacing the problem software with a completely different piece of software, that doesn't even use nspluginwrapper. As well, the free flash plugin isn't compatible with all sites, so it's not a good replacement option.

So I'd say this is a possible workaround, but not really a fix for the bug.

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Leon (leonbo) wrote :

I first had Hardy installed with the flash 10 package from Intrepid. Yesterday I decided to try the Alpha 5 release.

With Hardy I had no problems with flash. Now in Intrepid firefox keeps crashing randomly while spitting out errors like this:

(npviewer.bin:13311): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:13311): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_style_detach: assertion `style->attach_count > 0' failed

Revision history for this message
Leon (leonbo) wrote :

I use x86_64 by the way. Sometimes firefox doesn't crash but the flash movies stop playing and the flash widget dissapears. This output is then generated:

GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetMIMEDescription
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetMIMEDescription return
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue: returning plugin name.
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue return
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue: returning plugin description.
GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x18aa850: NP_GetValue return
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: could not reconstruct XVisual from visualID
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: NPN_GetValue() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 15 in NPN_GetValue()
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: NPN_InvalidateRect() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: NPN_InvalidateRect() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_HandleEvent() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_WriteReady() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_Write() invoke: Message type invalid
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_DestroyStream() invoke: Broken pipe

(firefox:15401): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_remove_internal: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_URLNotify() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_SetWindow() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_HandleEvent() invoke: Connection closed

These errors are easies to generate and are more consequent.

Revision history for this message
SoloTurn (soloturn) wrote :

changing from the nonfree flash to the combination of libswfdec-0.7.4-1 and swfdec-mozilla-0.7.4-2-ubuntu1 allows playing new flash contents like youtube?

Revision history for this message
SoloTurn (soloturn) wrote :

tried it now, the version number was just confusing (i.e. 0.7.1 = 0.7.4-1). it works ok her, except that positioning in the middle of a video seems not really clean, example http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXEHcibQ5jA&feature=dir. it either tries to download all before starting playing or does not take the new location within the video.

but, no crashes up to now ...

Revision history for this message
Leon (leonbo) wrote :

SoloTurn: where can I get the .4 packages? I'l try them then, but I can only find up to 0.7-1 in the repositories.

Revision history for this message
Leon (leonbo) wrote :

Ow wait, that's for the free version. I'm using the nonfree one.

Revision history for this message
ktp420 (ktp420) wrote :

Bug #272286 might have found the real problem...it says nspluginwrapper 1.1.0 does not support wmode correctly with Flash 10 RC2

Revision history for this message
Felipe De la Puente (fdelapuente) wrote :

In my box, the flash widgets aren't working at all, just grey zones. But I've found that when I update the flash plugin with nspluginwrapper while firefox is closed:

nspluginwrapper -u /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-alternative.so

after doing that, I got firefox+flash working, it seems there is something with nspluginwrapper update in my case. BTW I have nspluginwrapper 1.1.0, Intrepid AMD64, up-to-date.

Greetings, Felipe.

Revision history for this message
ktp420 (ktp420) wrote :

If get a crash with nspluginwrapper and flash, you can try disabling windowless mode in the plugin itself by creating /etc/adobe/mms.cfg and putting following in it:

WindowlessDisable=true

Revision history for this message
Bremm (bremm) wrote :

Does it work, for example, if the plugin crashes randomly loading
videos from youtube or metacafe? Because I've noticed random crashes
since last npviewer update.

Revision history for this message
Bremm (bremm) wrote :

2008/9/23 Bremm <email address hidden>:
> Does it work, for example, if the plugin crashes randomly loading
> videos from youtube or metacafe? Because I've noticed random crashes
> since last npviewer update.

I've got what happens when a flash turn gray with no warning.

*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPClass::Invalidate() invoke: Conexão
terminada pela outra ponta
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_NewStream() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_Destroy() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPObject 0x95aec20 is not valid!
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_Destroy() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPObject 0x45335a0 is not valid!
--
Márcio Bremm -- http://vtnc.org/

Pessoas não mudam, apenas mascaram sua real identidade.
People don't change, only mask their real identity.
Люди не меняются, только маскируют свою реальную идентичность.

Revision history for this message
Walter_Wittel (wittelw) wrote :

@Felipe De la Puente -- I also had only gray boxes and several days ago used Synaptic to uninstall (remove all) then reinstall flashpougin-nonfree (Adobe) and it is now working again (youtube and others). I'm still getting crashes at about the same frequency (as when it was only displaying gray boxes).

One of the upgrades must have missed some new configuration or something...

Revision history for this message
Felipe De la Puente (fdelapuente) wrote :

You're right, I did that yesterday, and is working relatively well now, but
I got the crash reports sometimes, as you said... Thank you anyway.

Greetings, Felipe.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Walter_Wittel <email address hidden> wrote:

> @Felipe De la Puente -- I also had only gray boxes and several days ago
> used Synaptic to uninstall (remove all) then reinstall flashpougin-
> nonfree (Adobe) and it is now working again (youtube and others). I'm
> still getting crashes at about the same frequency (as when it was only
> displaying gray boxes).
>
> One of the upgrades must have missed some new configuration or
> something...
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
ATTE:
Hernán Felipe De la Puente Christen
Móvil : 93199807
ICQ : 58547127
MSN/Google Talk : <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Stephen Cradock (s-cradock) wrote :

I just got the segfault again after updating Firefox and re-starting. Displaying a fairly standard web-page - probably msn home page.

Revision history for this message
ibizatunes (ibizatunes) wrote :

I have this bug in ubuntu 8.10 alpha 6

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote :

Confirmed. Just installed 64bit ubuntu, installed flash, went to watch a youtube, got the error but videos are playing just fine.

Revision history for this message
Marcel (marcel-vd-berg) wrote :

Confirmed 8.10 64bit alpha6. Watched Youtube and other flash site (weer.nl) while toggling Noscript settings.

Revision history for this message
Leu (mail2leu) wrote :

confirmed for ubuntu 8.10 Beta. Crashed on flash-site (heute.de) while switching NoScript.

Revision history for this message
TobiasDomhan (tdomhan) wrote :

confirmed for ubuntu 8.10 beta amd64. where opening a site containing flash stuff(golem.de)

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

This bug has already been triaged, so there is no need to further confirm the problem. Doing so only creates unnecessary bug mail for the large number of subscribers, so please comment only if you are providing new information about the bug. Thanks for your help.

Revision history for this message
Kai Arne (kaiarne5) wrote :

I have this bug in ubuntu 8.10 Beta

Revision history for this message
Patrick Rady (prady) wrote :

Crashed while at EW.COM

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Patrick: Don't attach .crash files as they may contain sensitive information; you should only submit them with apport. I have removed the attachment. This bug has already been submitted with apport, so your .crash file is not necessary here.

Again, no more confirmation of this issue is needed. We know it's a problem, and the bug is triaged. If you just wish to notify us that you are experiencing the problem, you can use the 'affects me' flag at the top of the page. Thanks again.

Revision history for this message
gnuckx (gnuckx) wrote :

npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

It happens when starting Firefox or Prism

Revision history for this message
Don Forigua (ingforigua) wrote :

The firefox crash when i use flashplayer-nonfree

2008/10/17 Michael Castielli <email address hidden>

> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>
> It happens when starting Firefox or Prism
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
                            最もよいエンジニア
                  コロンビアの地下のチーム (CUT)
                          コロンビアの国民大学
                                    ボゴタ
                                 コロンビア
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
...Gratis lo recibisteis; dadlo gratis. (Mt 10, 8)
Visita mi blog http://ingeniero-forigua.blogspot.com/

Revision history for this message
Jose Luis Rodilla (jlrodilla) wrote :

Let me tell you that I think that your "big" sign and your blog
self-promotion are over the top in this kind of bug-threads.

Greetings

Revision history for this message
Don Forigua (ingforigua) wrote :

Sorry is my signature

2008/10/17 Jose Luis Rodilla <email address hidden>

> Let me tell you that I think that your "big" sign and your blog
> self-promotion are over the top in this kind of bug-threads.
>
> Greetings
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Jose Luis Rodilla (jlrodilla) wrote :

No problem. Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Brad Johnson (kkhww1902) wrote :

According to the bug status, this is fixed in Mandriva. Please evaluate if the same fix can be done in intrepid.

Revision history for this message
Tiago Fassoni (tiagofassoni) wrote :

Could you send the webpage with the bug in mandriva, please?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Brad Johnson <email address hidden>wrote:

> According to the bug status, this is fixed in Mandriva. Please evaluate
> if the same fix can be done in intrepid.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Brad Johnson (kkhww1902) wrote :

It's already linked to at the top of this bug, but here's the link:

https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=39264

Revision history for this message
Harrison Conlin (harrisony) wrote :

The mandriva report looks unrelated to me and more related to bug 192888 as it references it multiple times

Revision history for this message
eric.rost (eric-rost) wrote :

UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM THIS BUG. WHEN I CLICK UNSUBSCRIBE LOGGED IN AS THIS
ACCOUNT, IT TELLS ME I'M FORBIDDEN. I WANT TO TRACK THE BUGS THAT ACTUALLY
AFFECT ME AND THIS IS JUST SPAM AT THIS POINT.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Harrison Conlin <email address hidden> wrote:

> The mandriva report looks unrelated to me and more related to bug 192888
> as it references it multiple times
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>

--
"A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates
it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral " -Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Revision history for this message
Harrison Conlin (harrisony) wrote :

To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in mind.

Revision history for this message
eric.rost (eric-rost) wrote :

If you could, please cite what part of that code I violated by informing (I
hope) someone who has the power to unsubscribe me from this bug (which still
hasn't happened) that there was a problem unsubscribing, then updating the
relevant bug against launchpad on launchpad?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Harrison Conlin <email address hidden> wrote:

> To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by
> humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in
> mind.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>

--
"A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates
it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral " -Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Revision history for this message
Bremm (bremm) wrote :

@Eric:

Be respectful. (from conduct rules page)

The Ubuntu community and its members treat one another with respect.
Everyone can make a valuable contribution to Ubuntu. We may not always
agree, but disagreement is no excuse for poor behaviour and poor
manners. We might all experience some frustration now and then, but we
cannot allow that frustration to turn into a personal attack. It's
important to remember that a community where people feel uncomfortable
or threatened is not a productive one. We expect members of the Ubuntu
community to be respectful when dealing with other contributors as
well as with people outside the Ubuntu project, and with users of
Ubuntu.

I agree with that part about forbidding access; it's just annoying,
but necessary because apport sometimes attach sensitive data to
automated reports (which is wrong, but people tend to do the easy
way...).

If you didn't notice yet, you're subscribed to every duplicated bug,
as I am. In my case:

"You received this bug notification because you are a direct
subscriber of the bug (via bug 141613)."

Hope I did clear your doubts. Have a nice day.

2008/11/14 eric.rost <email address hidden>:
> If you could, please cite what part of that code I violated by informing (I
> hope) someone who has the power to unsubscribe me from this bug (which still
> hasn't happened) that there was a problem unsubscribing, then updating the
> relevant bug against launchpad on launchpad?
--
Márcio Bremm -- http://vtnc.org/

Pessoas não mudam, apenas mascaram sua real identidade.
People don't change, only mask their real identity.
Люди не меняются, только маскируют свою реальную идентичность.

Revision history for this message
jvtemple (jvtemple) wrote :

Re email below. I am afraid I do not understand what this is about

John Temple

Quoting Harrison Conlin <email address hidden>:

> To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by
> humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in
> mind.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't even
> notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT 2007
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>
>

Revision history for this message
Christopher Skelton (sketec) wrote :

I was completely fed up with this issue as well, but I found out that nspluginwrapper is at a newer version 1.1.4 which I found here http://freshmeat.net/projects/nspluginwrapper/?branch_id=75051&release_id=288070. I installed it from source on my system and the problems went away, so far at least. Here I built a .deb for you all to use. I didn't know how to put in a description. I'm sure there is a way to add it, but I spent hours researching and finding all the dependencies I need to compile/make nspluginwrapper and I was just too tired to figure that out. Just uninstall the version currently installed and flashplugin-nonfree. Then install the nspluginwrapper I provided and then reinstall flashplugin-nonfree. Restart Firefox and it should be fixed now.

Revision history for this message
Eugene Savelov (savelov) wrote :

Christopher,

I tried your .deb package, but it does not contain any executable files, and does not work for me

Revision history for this message
Андрей Калинин (prize2step) wrote :

This deb do not contain ndiswrapper executable file. :(

2008/11/16 sketec <email address hidden>

> I was completely fed up with this issue as well, but I found out that
> nspluginwrapper is at a newer version 1.1.4 which I found here
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/nspluginwrapper/?branch_id=75051&release_id=288070
> .
> I installed it from source on my system and the problems went away, so
> far at least. Here I built a .deb for you all to use. I didn't know how
> to put in a description. I'm sure there is a way to add it, but I spent
> hours researching and finding all the dependencies I need to
> compile/make nspluginwrapper and I was just too tired to figure that
> out. Just uninstall the version currently installed and flashplugin-
> nonfree. Then install the nspluginwrapper I provided and then reinstall
> flashplugin-nonfree. Restart Firefox and it should be fixed now.
>
> ** Attachment added: "nspluginwrapper_1.1.4ubuntu1-1_amd64.deb"
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19683098/nspluginwrapper_1.1.4ubuntu1-1_amd64.deb
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Philipp Dreimann (philipp-dreimann-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

I've build nspluginwrapper 1.1.4 in my ppa https://edge.launchpad.net/~philipp-dreimann/+archive .

You've to reinstall flashplugin-nonfree with "sudo aptitude reinstall flashplugin-nonfree" to get it working. (FF crashes without this step for me)

Revision history for this message
Fidor (fidor-nemo) wrote :

While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems

You can download it here:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html

Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/ and remove all nspluginwrapper versions.

After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash work flawlessly for me.

Revision history for this message
Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu (undergraver) wrote :

Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
package in case of 64 bit systems?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <email address hidden> wrote:
> While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
>
> You can download it here:
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
>
> Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/ and
> remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
>
> After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> work flawlessly for me.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Bremm (bremm) wrote :

2008/11/20 Fidor <email address hidden>:
> While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
>
> You can download it here:
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
>
> Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/ and
> remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
>
> After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> work flawlessly for me.

Confirmed for me. It's working so far nicely. The coolest things about
this beta plugin are:

* You can open two or even more youtube videos at same time and don't
notice those annoying gray boxes;
* Less comsumption of cpu resources (mem and cycles).

Many thanks about the good news!
--
Márcio Bremm -- http://vtnc.org/

Pessoas não mudam, apenas mascaram sua real identidade.
People don't change, only mask their real identity.
Люди не меняются, только маскируют свою реальную идентичность.

Revision history for this message
Fidor (fidor-nemo) wrote :

Adobe says it's an alpha release - however it works stable as far as I can tell.

Revision history for this message
Philip_W (philip-b-weiss) wrote :
Download full text (5.1 KiB)

@ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
    If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
version.
    Only way to use it right now is to unistall whatever Flash you have
installed now and put
    the new 64bit Flash in your Firefox plug-ins. (from what I have read it
is not working for all browsers
    yet.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
> package in case of 64 bit systems?
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <email address hidden> wrote:
> > While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> > bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
> >
> > You can download it here:
> > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
> >
> > Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/ and
> > remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
> >
> > After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> > work flawlessly for me.
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of a duplicate bug.
> >
> > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> >
> > Bug description:
> > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> >
> > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> >
> > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> >
> > ProblemType: Crash
> > Architecture: amd64
> > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > ProcEnviron:
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > SHELL=/bin/bash
> > Signal: 11
> > SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> > Stacktrace:
> > #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> > #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> > StacktraceTop:
> > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > ?? ()
> > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv
> netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crash...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Defcon1 (brentonhaven) wrote :
Download full text (7.6 KiB)

It works great with FF 3.0.4, seems to be extremely stable and much father
along than an alpha release. I have been running in since yesterday and its
been much better than the regular version.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Philip_W <email address hidden> wrote:

> @ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
> If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
> version.
> Only way to use it right now is to unistall whatever Flash you have
> installed now and put
> the new 64bit Flash in your Firefox plug-ins. (from what I have read it
> is not working for all browsers
> yet.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
> > package in case of 64 bit systems?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <email address hidden> wrote:
> > > While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> > > bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
> > >
> > > You can download it here:
> > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
> > >
> > > Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/
> and
> > > remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
> > >
> > > After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> > > work flawlessly for me.
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of a duplicate bug.
> > >
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> > >
> > > Bug description:
> > > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> > >
> > > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> > >
> > > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
> me
> > that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> > even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> > >
> > > ProblemType: Crash
> > > Architecture: amd64
> > > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> > /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > > ProcEnviron:
> > >
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > > SHELL=/bin/bash
> > > Signal: 11
> > > SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> > > Stacktrace:
> > > #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> > > #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> > stack?)
> > > StacktraceTop:
> >...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :
Download full text (5.7 KiB)

New alpha plugin seems to work like a charm on my Intrepid with Firefox 3.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 23:25, Philip_W <email address hidden> wrote:

> @ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
> If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
> version.
> Only way to use it right now is to unistall whatever Flash you have
> installed now and put
> the new 64bit Flash in your Firefox plug-ins. (from what I have read it
> is not working for all browsers
> yet.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
> > package in case of 64 bit systems?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <email address hidden> wrote:
> > > While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> > > bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
> > >
> > > You can download it here:
> > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
> > >
> > > Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/
> and
> > > remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
> > >
> > > After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> > > work flawlessly for me.
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of a duplicate bug.
> > >
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> > >
> > > Bug description:
> > > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> > >
> > > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> > >
> > > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
> me
> > that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> > even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> > >
> > > ProblemType: Crash
> > > Architecture: amd64
> > > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> > /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > > ProcEnviron:
> > >
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > > SHELL=/bin/bash
> > > Signal: 11
> > > SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> > > Stacktrace:
> > > #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> > > #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> > stack?)
> > > StacktraceTop:
> > > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > ?? ()
> > > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
_Chekov_ (jori-kuusinen) wrote :
Download full text (8.1 KiB)

Just to let you all know, that very same plugin works flawlessly under
Opera 9.6x 64-bit browser as well.

The only thing what has to be done is linking statically to that
Adobe Flash plugin. For me with Kubuntu 8.10 it worked out in the
following manner:

cd /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
ln -s /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so libflashplayer.so

It works like charm. You should make sure though that nspluginwrapper
is removed.

With both browsers you can confirm that you are using Adobe's Flash
plugin by typing in the new tab/window:

about:plugins

Cheers,

J o r i

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Philip_W <email address hidden> wrote:

> @ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
> If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
> version.
> Only way to use it right now is to unistall whatever Flash you have
> installed now and put
> the new 64bit Flash in your Firefox plug-ins. (from what I have read it
> is not working for all browsers
> yet.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
> > package in case of 64 bit systems?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <email address hidden> wrote:
> > > While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> > > bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
> > >
> > > You can download it here:
> > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
> > >
> > > Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/
> and
> > > remove all nspluginwrapper versions.
> > >
> > > After removing nspluginwrapper, and installing 64-bit version - flash
> > > work flawlessly for me.
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of a duplicate bug.
> > >
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > > Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> > >
> > > Bug description:
> > > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> > >
> > > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> > >
> > > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
> me
> > that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> > even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> > >
> > > ProblemType: Crash
> > > Architecture: amd64
> > > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> > /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > > ProcEnviron:
> > >
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > > SHELL=/bin/...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
umer (umer-farooq) wrote :

Just wanted to let everyone know that so far the adobe plug-in is working flawlessly for me as well. Now on websites, the menu doesn't go behind other flash stuff either. Good bye grey boxes!

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

I just modified the latest flashplugin-nonfree package from intrepid to install the 64-bit alpha instead of the stable version of flash, and uploaded the resulting package to my webspace. Interested users can use it to install the 64-bit alpha without getting their hands dirty.

http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.20.7~20081117sruggier1_amd64.deb

Run the following to obtain the source package:
dget http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.20.7~20081117sruggier1.dsc

Revision history for this message
Manuel McLure (manuel-mclure) wrote :

I wish I could say that the new 64-bit Adobe flash plugin works for me, but it causes loading Gmail to crash my Firefox (why, I don't know, since as far as I know Gmail doesn't use flash.) I'm still looking for a good solution.

Revision history for this message
Kevin (kevinshlee) wrote :

The flash 64bit alpha from Adobe works on mine as well. Thank you guys for the good information!

Regards,
Kevin

Revision history for this message
chapterthree (chapterthree) wrote :

(I know this is outside of the scope of this bug, but I'll join in on the bug hijack party)

I am also having regular crashes while using the 64-bit alpha Adobe Flash Plugin. Browser generally doesn't stay up for more than a minute or two. Didn't get much in the way of helpful output upon the crash (the IcedTea message was well before the segfault):

chapterthree@home:/var/log$ firefox
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Segmentation fault

No apport, and not a peep in /var/log/ (no cry for help).

This definitely looks encouraging though, I'm very happy to see Adobe has decided to dabble in a bit of 21st century technology. And if it's working out of the gate for most of the previous commenters, I believe I should be able to get it to work too. I'm going to try to narrow down why I'm crashing, including starting from a clean FF install.

Revision history for this message
Bremm (bremm) wrote :

Weird, here is working fine even with that ppt2swf available thru Gmail.

2008/11/22 Manuel McLure <email address hidden>:
> I wish I could say that the new 64-bit Adobe flash plugin works for me,
> but it causes loading Gmail to crash my Firefox (why, I don't know,
> since as far as I know Gmail doesn't use flash.) I'm still looking for a
> good solution.

Did you try run FF into gdb?
--
Márcio Bremm -- http://vtnc.org/

Pessoas não mudam, apenas mascaram sua real identidade.
People don't change, only mask their real identity.
Люди не меняются, только маскируют свою реальную идентичность.

Revision history for this message
Scott Wegner (swegner) wrote :
Download full text (3.3 KiB)

It should be noted that, before you install the 64-bit alpha driver,
you should first completely remove the flashplugin-nonfree and
nspluginwrapper packages from your computer. There's an article which
describes the procedure here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Install-Adobe-Flash-Player-64-bit-on-Ubuntu-8-10-98076.shtml

Although really, we should try to limit the discussions here to the
npviewer.bin bug.

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:42 PM, chapterthree <email address hidden> wrote:
> (I know this is outside of the scope of this bug, but I'll join in on
> the bug hijack party)
>
> I am also having regular crashes while using the 64-bit alpha Adobe
> Flash Plugin. Browser generally doesn't stay up for more than a minute
> or two. Didn't get much in the way of helpful output upon the crash
> (the IcedTea message was well before the segfault):
>
> chapterthree@home:/var/log$ firefox
> ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
> Segmentation fault
>
> No apport, and not a peep in /var/log/ (no cry for help).
>
> This definitely looks encouraging though, I'm very happy to see Adobe
> has decided to dabble in a bit of 21st century technology. And if it's
> working out of the gate for most of the previous commenters, I believe I
> should be able to get it to work too. I'm going to try to narrow down
> why I'm crashing, including starting from a clean FF install.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> Status in "nspluginwrapper" source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux promet...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Manuel McLure (manuel-mclure) wrote :

Interestingly enough, when I put the 64-bit plugin into ~/.mozilla/plugins instead of /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, the crashes don't seem to happen. Or maybe it's because this time I deleted all instances of pluginreg.dat under ~/.mozilla. In any case, it seems to be working now.

Revision history for this message
chapterthree (chapterthree) wrote :

No luck for me :( Both /usr/lib/ and ~/.mozilla/ end up with a crash. I also removed the pluginreg.dat to see if that helped. So I think I'm the only one reporting the crashes at this point huh? Bummer.

chapterthree@home:~$ sudo updatedb
chapterthree@home:~$ sudo locate -i flashplayer | egrep -v "/home/chapterthree/.macromedia/"
/data/src/libflashplayer-10.0.d20.7.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
/data/src/libflashplayer.so
/home/chapterthree/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
chapterthree@home:~$ sudo locate -i nsplugin
chapterthree@home:~$

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

Can someone justify this bug's recent change in status?

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote :

Not me. What happened to set it as "Fix Committed"?

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

It was changed by someone, whose identity is in the activity log.

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Changed status back to triaged. R_c, please don't change the status without giving a reason.

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Fix Committed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

I noticed that Adobe has updated the 64-bit flash alpha, so I've put a new version of the flashplugin-nonfree package at:
http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.21.1~sruggier1_amd64.deb

source package at:
dget http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.21.1~sruggier1.dsc

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.15.3ubuntu1 for Jaunty is now the 64-bit version, so there should be no need for third-party flash packages. Bug 310061 is the Intrepid backport request.

Using the 64-bit plugin is not a fix for the nspluginwrapper bug, but will instead allow flash users to avoid nspluginwrapper entirely.

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote : Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

Thanks for the .deb for 8.10

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Hew McLachlan <email address hidden> wrote:
> flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.15.3ubuntu1 for Jaunty is now the 64-bit
> version, so there should be no need for third-party flash packages. Bug
> 310061 is the Intrepid backport request.
>
> Using the 64-bit plugin is not a fix for the nspluginwrapper bug, but
> will instead allow flash users to avoid nspluginwrapper entirely.

Obviously it's not a fix for any bug in nspluginwrapper, but since the
bug thread contained discussion about the 64-bit alpha, I posted a
link here. I assumed that the Jaunty version[1] used the 32-bit flash
plugin still, because the version remained the same. I would think it
makes more sense to have two packages with their own versions, to
avoid versioning confusion. Users interested in 64-bit flash should
get it from Jaunty, to ensure that their flashplugin-nonfree package
will be updated when they upgrade to jaunty.

[1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/flashplugin-nonfree

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Actually, the best deb to use for Intrepid users is the backport candidate at bug 310061. This is actively undergoing testing, and feedback on different architectures and DEs is appreciated in that report.

The reason for the version confusion is that the 32-bit version remains the same, while the new 64-bit version is different. This is mentioned in the changelog, and I think it's the best we can do while having two different versions in the same package.

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

The symptoms reported in the original poster's description should be resolved in jaunty's nspluginwrapper. It would be immensely helpful if people could verify via an alpha 2 desktop vm.

Revision history for this message
Jean.c.h (slug71) wrote :

Not sure if its the same bug but ive had 3 npviewer.bin crashes in the last few days. I have been unable to report the bug using apport because of a bug in there. I am using Jaunty AMD64, all updates applied on Ext4.

Revision history for this message
Jean.c.h (slug71) wrote :

2/3 times was when i went to Youtube as it was loading the Main Page.

Revision history for this message
Jean.c.h (slug71) wrote :

Can we just get rid of this piece of junk?

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote :

Depends on how does Adobe do with the 64bit player before it's not too late
to have it in 9.04. There are still bad bugs in it (like being unable to
display letter "a" and spaces). At least when I checked a month or so ago.

Oliver Sic (soliver)
Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Triaged → Fix Released
Hew (hew)
Changed in nspluginwrapper:
status: Fix Released → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Jean.c.h (slug71) wrote :

Confirming that it is the same bug from my post first on 2009-01-11.
Using Jaunty AMD64 Alpha-3 all updates applied. On Ext4 FS.

Revision history for this message
ibizatunes (ibizatunes) wrote :

I have it as well in 9.04, EXT4 all patches applied at Alpha 3 stage

Revision history for this message
Mitchell (mitchellvc) wrote :

I have found in forosuse:
http://www.forosuse.org/forosuse/showthread.php?t=17529
a workaround for the cpu usage, in my case I'm running Intrepid amd64, and FF, and npviewer was consuming 75% of CPU, after aplying the following:
$ sudo nspluginwrapper -v -a -u
The usage decreased to 4 %, incredible!, i have to point aout that the increase in the usage were after I was reconfiguring my video driver and manipulating xorg.conf.

Revision history for this message
nullack (nullack) wrote :

Confirming that the newish revision that hit the repos of the flash plugin, 10.0.15.3 has sadly not fixed the crash.

Revision history for this message
Danny Wood (danwood76) wrote :

This crash is caused by flash.
If you install the 64-bit version of flash (very new and still in alpha testing) this crash goes away.
You also need to remove nsplugginwrapper and the previous version of flash otherwise it still loads and crashes even though you are using the 64-bit version of flash.

Revision history for this message
nullack (nullack) wrote :

Dan that is not my experience on 64 bit 10.0.15.3, The 64bit revision will still segfault. With the 64bit flash install, jaunty still gives the user 32bit libs as per the changes Alexander Slack made.

Revision history for this message
Danny Wood (danwood76) wrote :

You dont quite understand me.

The latest release of flash doesnt support 64-bit, and the ubuntu repos will reflect this.
If you remove the flash plugin and nsplugin wrapper through synaptic and install the alpha version of 64 bit flash from adobe labs:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
then you will have working flash with no crashes.

I haven't had a firefox/nsplugin crash since I installed the plugin and it works perfectly with everything I view from the bbc to youtube.

The 64 bit flash plugin wont make it into the main repos until it becomes public and is released by adobe.

I think I posted this earlier in this bug report so sorry for re posting!

Revision history for this message
Martin Olsson (mnemo) wrote :

FWIW, I got 10.0.15.3ubuntu3 from jaunty and I just got another one of these npviewer.bin crashes. My bug report here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/328551

However, in general Flash works _GREAT_ for me in jaunty compared to intrepid though. I can play sound from many applications at once, including Flash+totem or whatever. I never had the actual browser crash because of Flash and pretty much every single Flash applet I wanted to use worked right away (youtube, vimeo, booking tickets etc etc).

Revision history for this message
Jean.c.h (slug71) wrote :

This crash is solved with the official 64bit Alpha of Adobe Flash.

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote :

Just imagine how the anti-fanboys would go nuts though if Ubuntu shipped an
alpha of Flash - when they raised a hell of a storm after it shipped a beta
of Firefox ;)

Revision history for this message
Ken Foskey (foskey) wrote :

On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 22:50 +0000, Slug71 wrote:

> This crash is solved with the official 64bit Alpha of Adobe Flash.

How can this be fixed if Intrepid still uses the 32 bit wrapper
version?

Setting up nspluginwrapper (1.1.2-0ubuntu1) ...
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (10.0.15.3ubuntu1~intrepid1) ...
Downloading...
--2009-02-13 10:16:19--
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz

It has to be the 64 bit one or else it crashes.

Thanks
Ken

Revision history for this message
lilly-marlene (muszka-na-rowerku) wrote :

I'm not sure this is the same bug but I have a crash on Jaunty alpha 4 amd64 (ext4) when tried to open the downloaded with firefox pdf document in Okular.

Revision history for this message
Christian Wilken (drwilken) wrote :

Same here... Also Jaunty Alpha 4, AMD64 and ext4...

Revision history for this message
Daniel Semblano (dsemblano) wrote :

Jaunty Alpha 4, PentiumD and ext4...

Revision history for this message
Popolon (popolon) wrote :

jaunty alpha6 amd64 (atom 330) and ext4, flash 10.0 r22 (don't know if its 64bit version)

Revision history for this message
Chris Gresty (chris-gresty) wrote :

fresh install of jaunty alpha6, amd64, ext4. crash in firefox when displaying a timesonline.com page with flash adverts.

Revision history for this message
old_salt (awtposts-nc) wrote :

Running Jaunty development 64bit.

Crash occured viewing Accuweather website Flash Video window.

Revision history for this message
Rocko (rockorequin) wrote :

npviewer.bin used to crash frequently until I switched over to the 64 bit Flash 10 plugin (I've been using the alpha released on Feb 24). The 64 bit plugin hasn't segfaulted at all in over a month.

Revision history for this message
Martin Olsson (mnemo) wrote :

I have flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 installed on my 64-bit jaunty and I get this npviewer.bin maybe once per two days. It's absolutely not fixed.

Revision history for this message
Blake Munro (blake-munro) wrote :

I can confirm that running the native (alpha version) of the Adobe Flash
plugin on an amd64 system makes this error go away. So by removing the
flashplugin-nonfree package and installing the Adobe 64bit alpha version
(with Firefox) I am no longer receiving this error.

Cheers
Blake Munro

2009/3/27 martin <email address hidden>

> I have flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 installed on my 64-bit
> jaunty and I get this npviewer.bin maybe once per two days. It's
> absolutely not fixed.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Mitchell (mitchellvc) wrote :

Since the amd64 native alpha plugin from Adobe fix this bug, could someone distribute a flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 package that download the amd64 plugin from http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz and that does not depend on the nspluginwrapper package?, I think that this is a good solution until whether a final x86_64 plugin is released or the 32 bit plugin fix the problem. Notice that what I'm proposing is to distribute this package temporarily and for the ones that don't have any inconvenience in using an alpha 64-bit plugin.

Revision history for this message
Collin Stocks (collinstocks) wrote :

I can confirm that this is still a bug in the current build of Jaunty beta 64-bit.

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

I have removed all versions of Flash and downloaded the 64-bit libflashplayer.so. It currently sits on my Desktop. Where should I put it please?

Revision history for this message
Blake Munro (blake-munro) wrote :

The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins

Note that the "plugins" directory does not exist by default. You need to
create it first before moving the plugin there.

Same goes for the new Sun Java 64 bit plugin, you can copy a .so file into
that same plugin folder to get access to the new native Sun 64 bit Firefox
plugin. Google for more info, sorry for going off topic

2009/3/29 bwallum <email address hidden>

> I have removed all versions of Flash and downloaded the 64-bit
> libflashplayer.so. It currently sits on my Desktop. Where should I put
> it please?
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
torro (aklimuk) wrote :

... kernel: [ 1522.128178] npviewer.bin[7117]: segfault at 20000000 ip 00000000f69ac28d sp 00000000ffd05060 error 4 in libflashplayer.so[f686e000+96d000]

Occurred on Kernel 2.6.27-11, x86_64.

Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22

File: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
Size: 10131640

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

>The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins

That's what the instructions say right enough but I just get a blank window where the flash movie should be.

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote :

Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
feb 3)

Revision history for this message
torro (aklimuk) wrote :

Hi,

I have Flash-Plugin 10.0.22 from 24.02.09. The Problem is still there.
Ubuntu 8.10 x64, Intel.

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Vadim Peretokin <email address hidden>wrote:

> Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
> feb 3)
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
> Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
> Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> PackageArchitecture: amd64
> ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> ProcCwd: /home/laga
> ProcEnviron:
>
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev
> plugdev powerdev scanner video
>

Revision history for this message
Blake Munro (blake-munro) wrote :

If you are running the Adobe Alpha 64 bit Flash Player then make sure you
have removed the 32bit flashplugin-nonfree package and or disabled the
plugin in Firefox, so that only the native 64 bit version is allowed to run.
It's a temorary workaround.

Blake

2009/3/31 torro <email address hidden>

> Hi,
>
> I have Flash-Plugin 10.0.22 from 24.02.09. The Problem is still there.
> Ubuntu 8.10 x64, Intel.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Vadim Peretokin
> <email address hidden>wrote:
>
> > Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
> > feb 3)
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
> > Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> >
> > Bug description:
> > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> >
> > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> >
> > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling me
> > that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I didn't
> > even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> >
> > ProblemType: Crash
> > Architecture: amd64
> > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> > /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > ProcEnviron:
> >
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > SHELL=/bin/bash
> > Signal: 11
> > SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> > Stacktrace:
> > #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> > #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> stack?)
> > StacktraceTop:
> > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > ?? ()
> > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT
> > 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv
> netdev
> > plugdev powerdev scanner video
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

Blake Munro said "The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins"

I tried that and it didn't work. However I put libflashplayer.so into root/.mozilla/plugins and it did work. I used 'sudo nautilus' to move the libflashplayer.so from the Desktop to root/.mozilla/plugins. The .mozilla folder is hidden so you may need to use <ctrl h> to show the files. You cannot see anything in root unless you are root (hence 'sudo nautilus')

Also the libflashplayer.so file date of Feb 3 was released on Feb 24 according to Adobe labs, the two dates confused me for a while.

I uninstalled flashplugin non-free.

So far so good......do let me know if any of the above is contrary to your experience please.

Revision history for this message
Blake Munro (blake-munro) wrote :

If you needed to move it to /root/.mozilla/plugins then you must be logging
into your system as root.
If you are any other user then you'd be using
/home/username/.mozilla/plugins for sure.
Not sure what is going on there but glad you got it working... I'm just a
little puzzled that you might be logging in as root in every session :)

Blake

2009/3/31 bwallum <email address hidden>

> Blake Munro said "The file needs to go in
> /home/username/.mozilla/plugins"
>
> I tried that and it didn't work. However I put libflashplayer.so into
> root/.mozilla/plugins and it did work. I used 'sudo nautilus' to move
> the libflashplayer.so from the Desktop to root/.mozilla/plugins. The
> .mozilla folder is hidden so you may need to use <ctrl h> to show the
> files. You cannot see anything in root unless you are root (hence 'sudo
> nautilus')
>
> Also the libflashplayer.so file date of Feb 3 was released on Feb 24
> according to Adobe labs, the two dates confused me for a while.
>
> I uninstalled flashplugin non-free.
>
> So far so good......do let me know if any of the above is contrary to
> your experience please.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Noel J. Bergman (noeljb) wrote :

I put it in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/, e.g.,

  $ sudo find / -name "libflashplayer.so"
  /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so

where it lives as:

  -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9543400 2009-02-02 23:03 /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so

rather than in a per-user plugins directory. And, yes, you want to uninstall flashplugin-nonfree if you're going to install the Adobe release by hand.

Revision history for this message
torro (aklimuk) wrote :
Download full text (5.3 KiB)

Hi, Blake,

on 64 bit Ubuntu I have ONLY 64 bit Flash Player. There are no any
directories or mounted drives, where 32 bit version could have been found.

So, the problem is still open.

Best regars,
Alexander

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Blake Munro <email address hidden> wrote:

> If you are running the Adobe Alpha 64 bit Flash Player then make sure you
> have removed the 32bit flashplugin-nonfree package and or disabled the
> plugin in Firefox, so that only the native 64 bit version is allowed to
> run.
> It's a temorary workaround.
>
> Blake
>
> 2009/3/31 torro <email address hidden>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have Flash-Plugin 10.0.22 from 24.02.09. The Problem is still there.
> > Ubuntu 8.10 x64, Intel.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Vadim Peretokin
> > <email address hidden>wrote:
> >
> > > Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours
> is
> > > feb 3)
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of the bug.
> > >
> > > Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> > > Status in “nspluginwrapper” source package in Mandriva: Fix Released
> > >
> > > Bug description:
> > > LATEST VERSION TESTED:
> > > nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
> > >
> > > Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
> > >
> > > Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
> me
> > > that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I
> didn't
> > > even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
> > >
> > > ProblemType: Crash
> > > Architecture: amd64
> > > Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
> > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
> > > ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
> > > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> > > Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
> > > PackageArchitecture: amd64
> > > ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin
> > > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection
> > > /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
> > > ProcCwd: /home/laga
> > > ProcEnviron:
> > >
> > >
> >
> PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> > > LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> > > SHELL=/bin/bash
> > > Signal: 11
> > > SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
> > > Stacktrace:
> > > #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from
> > > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> > > #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from
> > > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt
> > stack?)
> > > StacktraceTop:
> > > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > ?? ()
> > > ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> > > Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 03:18:44
> GMT
> > > 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv
> > netdev
> > > plugdev powerdev scanner video
> > >
> >
> > --
> > npvi...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

Hi Blake

Just to say I'm not running as root all the time in answer to your enquiry...but I am very pleased to report that the 64-bit flash alpha plugin has been working without fault for me.

I have removed nspluginwrapper and flashplugin-nonfree. However the last thing I did to get up and running ok was to INSTALL flashplugin-nonfree (having previously un-installed it) gone through the download and received the message that the 'architecture...' was invalid. At that point I cancelled the install and since then all has gone very well. I am wondering if the install process also installs a file other than the flash player per se and that I may have deleted that file in my enthusiasm to remove all previous versions of the flash player before downloading the 64-bit alpha.

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

Further insight:

If I run with nVidia accelerated graphics driver (version 180) FF hangs completely as soon as flash media is started.
If I run with the standard vesa driver the system is very stable.

Repeatable at will.

nspluginwrapper and flashplugin-nonfree have been removed
libflashplayer.so has been installed

description: VGA compatible controller
             product: G71 [GeForce 7300 GS]
             vendor: nVidia Corporation
             physical id: 0
             bus info: pci@0000:05:00.0
             version: a1
             width: 64 bits
             clock: 33MHz
             capabilities: pm msi pciexpress bus_master cap_list
             configuration: latency=0

description: CPU
       product: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
       vendor: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD]
       physical id: 3
       bus info: cpu@0
       version: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
       serial: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
       slot: CPU 1
       size: 2200MHz
       capacity: 2200MHz
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 200MHz
       capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp x86-64 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy cpufreq

Revision history for this message
Noel J. Bergman (noeljb) wrote :

> If I run with nVidia accelerated graphics driver (version 180) FF hangs completely as soon as flash media is started.

Which 180.___ --- the currently available one in the standard repository, or the one that works (see Bug 348852)?

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700
GPU: nVidia Corporation Quadro FX 570M [10de:040c] (rev a1)
kernel: 2.6.28-11.38 for x86_64
flash: Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22
nvidia driver: 180.44-0ubuntu1

And working fine.

Revision history for this message
a86samih (a86samih) wrote : [Bug 141613] npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

For me, everything was and is working fine.
I've encountred this problem two times, the first time, all i had to do
is to upgrade the flashplayer-plugin to the latest version released on
2009-02-24.
And now, i've this same problem because i've upgraded FireFox and kept the same flashplugin-nonfree version.
I'm not an expert in linux and ubuntu, but i think that this problem
can be solved if you find two compatible version of firefox and
flashplugin-nonfree.

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

Thanks for the steer Noel. I wasn't aware that the official repo issue was duff. This is what I have been running on:

bob@bob-desktop:~$ dpkg --list | grep nvidia
ii nvidia-173-modaliases 173.14.16-0ubuntu1 Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
rc nvidia-180-libvdpau 180.37-0ubuntu2 Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix
ii nvidia-180-modaliases 180.37-0ubuntu2 Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
ii nvidia-71-modaliases 71.86.08-0ubuntu1 Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
ii nvidia-96-modaliases 96.43.10-0ubuntu1 Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
ii nvidia-common 0.2.9 Find obsolete NVIDIA drivers
rc nvidia-glx-177 177.82-0ubuntu0.1 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver
rc nvidia-glx-180 180.37-0ubuntu2 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver
rc nvidia-settings 180.25-0ubuntu1 Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv

What do I need to do to load up the 180.44 version please? I have downloaded a package called NVIDIA-Linux-x86-180.44-pkg1.run but I'm not too sure where to go from there. I'm running Ubuntu Jaunty. I'll then try again and report back. Bob

Revision history for this message
Vadim Peretokin (vperetokin) wrote : Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
package list in synaptic and see if it's available (if not, switch to the
main ubuntu mirror)

Revision history for this message
Felipe De la Puente (fdelapuente) wrote :

I'm running on Jaunty-amd64, and nvidia-glx-180 works without problems. All
installed from the main repository, not a specific mirror like cl.ubuntu.com
.

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Vadim Peretokin <email address hidden>wrote:

> I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
> package list in synaptic and see if it's available (if not, switch to the
> main ubuntu mirror)
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

180.44 now in Jaunty repository (may be in others) and it runs fine. I have stable flash playing with 180.44.

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

Belay my last message, a bit too hasty I'm afraid. My system has just hung running 180.44. Required hardware restart to escape.

Revision history for this message
Knatchwa (rl-marr) wrote :

The system is updated to 180.44 and yet I still have no sound in Flash and the error message comes up almost regularly. Sounds works everywhere else but in online flash animations.

Firefox 3.08
AMD 64 9.04
S3 Unichrom Pro Igp

gissi (zerinol)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Raul (raulr) wrote :

Same bug as all here.
I've uploaded the logfile from

sudo valgrind --trace-children=yes --log-file=valgrind.txt --tool=memcheck /usr/bin/firefox

// Ubuntu 9.04 x64 BETA

Revision history for this message
Iriiko (aderach) wrote :

Hello,

I've just update to Karmic, 64 bit, and I confirm the crash, and no sound and few crash using Youtube, but I realised:

- before upgrading, I had installed the adobe 64 bits beta plugin 10,0,22,87 manually and it worked, without npviewer
- so, I removed the flash paquet in Synaptic : A error occured, see below, but It removed the plugin maybe installed during the upgrade process.
 - And now, everything is OK!!!!!

=> So, I hope the future 64 bits ubuntu version will use this 64 beta plugin instead of using npviewer.

See you!!!

Error I have in Synaptic (french, sorry!):
Suppression de flashplugin-installer ...
update-alternatives: error: pas d'alternatives pour iceape-flashplugin.
update-alternatives: error: pas d'alternatives pour iceape-flashplugin.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de flashplugin-installer (--remove) :
 le sous-processus script pre-removal installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2
postinst called with argument `abort-remove'
dpkg : erreur lors du nettoyage :
 le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

Kees Cook (kees)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Joe (jrgp) wrote :

I get this every now and then too. I'm running 64 bit karmic (upgraded from jaunty). It never takes firefox out, and the flash element in firefox always stays fine too.

It doesn't really bug me, but this error message popping up occasionally does kinda get annoying.

Revision history for this message
vnieto (vnieto) wrote :

http://queleimporta.com/en/finally-adobe-releases-native-64-bit-flash-10-for-linux/

The only way to sove it is install the native 64 bit flash

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, vnieto <email address hidden> wrote:
> The only way to sove it is install the native 64 bit flash

The cleanest way to do this is to use Debian's flashplugin-nonfree package:

http://packages.debian.org/testing/flashplugin-nonfree

Revision history for this message
bwallum (rbw2) wrote :

I agree with vnieto. Simon's route is fine too. I installed the native amd64 flashplugin and had minor hiccups. Removing nspluginwrapper fixed any residual issues for me.

Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Kevin (kevinshlee) wrote :

Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/

As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't released any GA version yet. Anyway, in my case, the 64 bit alpha version works much better than 32bit one with npviewer.

Regards,
Kevin

Revision history for this message
krutoileshii (krutoileshii) wrote :

Already have that. still the same problem

2009/10/5 Blade II <email address hidden>

> Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
>
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
>
> As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
> for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't released
> any GA version yet. Anyway, in my case, the 64 bit alpha version works
> much better than 32bit one with npviewer.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Kevin (kevinshlee) wrote :

Hello, krutoileshii

I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have "npviewer.bin
crashed with SIGSEGV" problem with the 64 bit one?
Are you sure you removed the 32 bit flash player before installing the 64
bit one?

Regards,
Kevin

2009/10/8 krutoileshii <email address hidden>

> Already have that. still the same problem
>
> 2009/10/5 Blade II <email address hidden>
>
> > Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
> >
> >
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
> >
> > As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
> > for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't released
> > any GA version yet. Anyway, in my case, the 64 bit alpha version works
> > much better than 32bit one with npviewer.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
krutoileshii (krutoileshii) wrote :

that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
sure. maybe some other plugin that uses it

2009/10/8 Blade II <email address hidden>

> Hello, krutoileshii
>
> I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
> flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have "npviewer.bin
> crashed with SIGSEGV" problem with the 64 bit one?
> Are you sure you removed the 32 bit flash player before installing the 64
> bit one?
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
>
> 2009/10/8 krutoileshii <email address hidden>
>
> > Already have that. still the same problem
> >
> > 2009/10/5 Blade II <email address hidden>
> >
> > > Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
> > >
> > > As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
> > > for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't
> released
> > > any GA version yet. Anyway, in my case, the 64 bit alpha version works
> > > much better than 32bit one with npviewer.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of the bug.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Kevin (kevinshlee) wrote :

OK, I got it. I was just curious. Then that's probably something else. I
hope you can find what uses the npviewer and replace with the 64 bit version
of it if available.
Regards,
Kevin

2009/10/9 krutoileshii <email address hidden>

> that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
> sure. maybe some other plugin that uses it
>
> 2009/10/8 Blade II <email address hidden>
>
> > Hello, krutoileshii
> >
> > I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
> > flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have
> "npviewer.bin
> > crashed with SIGSEGV" problem with the 64 bit one?
> > Are you sure you removed the 32 bit flash player before installing the 64
> > bit one?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > 2009/10/8 krutoileshii <email address hidden>
> >
> > > Already have that. still the same problem
> > >
> > > 2009/10/5 Blade II <email address hidden>
> > >
> > > > Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been
> available
> > > > for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't
> > released
> > > > any GA version yet. Anyway, in my case, the 64 bit alpha version
> works
> > > > much better than 32bit one with npviewer.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct
> subscriber
> > > > of the bug.
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > > of the bug.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Jason Smith (jassmith)
Revision history for this message
Mark Garland (p-launchpad-markgarland-co-uk) wrote :

I am running the 64bit Karmic Beta on an Intel i5.
This message appears almost randomly every few hours.
Happy to supply further information if requested.

MG

Jason Smith (jassmith)
Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
assignee: Jason Smith (jassmith) → nobody
Revision history for this message
Pali (pali) wrote :

I add 64 bit version of adobe flash plugin to my ppa https://launchpad.net/~pali.rohar/+archive/ppa

Revision history for this message
Vortex (ecbeachbum) wrote :

This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for this to post here...

Revision history for this message
matism (matism) wrote :

I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing. How does one unsubscribe?

--Mark Matis

At 08:25 PM 11/1/2009 +0000, Vortex wrote:
>This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu
>AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for
>this to post here...
>
>--
>npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>of the bug.
>
>Status in “nspluginwrapper” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>Status in “nspluginwrapper” package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
>Bug description:
>LATEST VERSION TESTED:
>nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
>Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
>Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an
>apport window telling me that npviewer.bin
>segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I
>didn't even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
>ProblemType: Crash
>Architecture: amd64
>Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
>DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
>ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
>NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
>Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
>PackageArchitecture: amd64
>ProcCmdline:
>/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
>--plugin
>/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>--connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
>ProcCwd: /home/laga
>ProcEnviron:
>
>PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
>Signal: 11
>SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
>Stacktrace:
> #0 0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> #1 0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>StacktraceTop:
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
> ?? ()
> ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP
>Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip
>floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video
>SegvAnalysis:
> Segfault happened at: 0xf6d5b2e8: cmpb $0x0,(%edx)
> PC (0xf6d5b2e8) ok
> source "$0x0" ok
> destination "(%edx)" (0x00000000) not located
> in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
>SegvReason: writing NULL VMA

Revision history for this message
nussmaus (nussmaus111) wrote :

any fixez in sight?

--- On Sun, 11/1/09, matism <email address hidden> wrote:

From: matism <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: <email address hidden>
Date: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 12:37 PM

I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing.  How does one unsubscribe?

--Mark Matis

At 08:25 PM 11/1/2009 +0000, Vortex wrote:
>This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu
>AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for
>this to post here...
>
>--
>npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>of the bug.
>
>Status in ânspluginwrapperâ package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
>Status in ânspluginwrapperâ package in Mandriva: Fix Released
>
>Bug description:
>LATEST VERSION TESTED:
>nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
>
>Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
>
>Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an
>apport window telling me that npviewer.bin
>segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I
>didn't even notice first. There was a youtube video playing in the background,
>
>ProblemType: Crash
>Architecture: amd64
>Date: Sat Sep 22 00:01:15 2007
>DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
>ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
>NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
>Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-3ubuntu2
>PackageArchitecture: amd64
>ProcCmdline:
>/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
>--plugin
>/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>--connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/31316-1
>ProcCwd: /home/laga
>ProcEnviron:
>
>PATH=/home/laga/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
>  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
>Signal: 11
>SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
>Stacktrace:
>  #0  0xf6d5b2e8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>  #1  0xffdf90b8 in ?? ()
>  #2  0xf70953a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>  Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>StacktraceTop:
>  ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>  ?? ()
>  ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
>Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>Uname: Linux prometheus 2.6.22-11-generic #1 SMP
>Mon Sep 17 03:18:44 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip
>floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video
>SegvAnalysis:
>  Segfault happened at: 0xf6d5b2e8:      cmpb   $0x0,(%edx)
>  PC (0xf6d5b2e8) ok
>  source "$0x0" ok
>  destination "(%edx)" (0x00000000) not located
> in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
>SegvReason: writing NULL VMA

--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

Revision history for this message
mark (powerofslack) wrote :

Not sure if this is related- in addition to the npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV, I have this phenotype: ever since Karmic upgrade I cannot view any flash videos in firefox at all ever, specifically: The first frame with the big arrow in the middle of it comes on, the play/pause in the bottom left is there, no 'waiting'/'loading' icons are happening, but even if i waaaaaaaait I cannot click on the play arrow in the center of the flash vid, or the play/pause in the lower left, or drag the time scroller along the bottom, and get any response. processes show a firefox and npviewer.bin ok and running, but any flash vid is frozen. If this isn't the same bug let me know where to file it maybe? Killing npviewer.bin and reloading the page is no help. happens with any flahs vid any time since upgrade.

Karmic, Firefox 3.5.4, flashplugin-installer 10.0.32.18-ubuntu1, Gnome 2.28.1, kernel 2.6.28-16-generic (cannot start the 2.6.31 kernel due to both the cannot recognize two identical hard drives bug and the didn;t build nvidia drivers successfully bug for now).

Revision history for this message
nussmaus (nussmaus111) wrote :

hi mark,
i had the same prob with karmic-64bit....i re-installed with karmic 1-386, and, voila!
flash works, no more blue-green movie playback, still a bit buggy (not sure it's really utilizing all 4 of my processor cores)....nvidia 173 seems to work better with my 9500gt than nvidia 185 driverz....[never install ANYTHING that ends in.0].....i should know better....each version of 8.04 was better than the previous, with 8.10 turning out best of all
wish i'd kept it....oh, well, back to poland (if it ain't broke.......)
mike/out

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, mark <email address hidden> wrote:

From: mark <email address hidden>
Subject: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: <email address hidden>
Date: Thursday, November 5, 2009, 2:02 PM

Not sure if this is related- in addition to the npviewer.bin crashed
with SIGSEGV, I have this phenotype:  ever since Karmic upgrade I cannot
view any flash videos in firefox at all ever, specifically:  The first
frame with the big arrow in the middle of it comes on, the play/pause in
the bottom left is there, no 'waiting'/'loading' icons are happening,
but even if i waaaaaaaait I cannot click on the play arrow in the center
of the flash vid, or the play/pause in the lower left, or drag the time
scroller along the bottom, and get any response.  processes show a
firefox and npviewer.bin ok and running, but any flash vid is frozen.
If this isn't the same bug let me know where to file it maybe?  Killing
npviewer.bin and reloading the page is no help.  happens with any flahs
vid any time since upgrade.

Karmic, Firefox 3.5.4, flashplugin-installer 10.0.32.18-ubuntu1, Gnome
2.28.1, kernel 2.6.28-16-generic (cannot start the 2.6.31 kernel due to
both the cannot recognize two identical hard drives bug and the didn;t
build nvidia drivers successfully bug for now).

--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

Revision history for this message
Jim Braux-Zin (j-brauxzin) wrote :

Mark according to your description you could also be encountering this well-known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/410407.

tags: added: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
iMac (imac-netstatz) wrote :

This flash npviewer issue has been bugging me for ages (even moreso since Karmic). It seems the latest 64bit Flash PPA resolves my issues (for a few days now), avoiding the wrapper completely, and providing stability on repeated YouTubing (where I easily tripped on this). I expect similar results for firefox 3.5 version as well (noting my Ubuntu-Tweaked versions below), but have little motivation to downgrade and test more thoroughly.

ii firefox 3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~mfs~karmic1
ii flashplugin64-installer 10.0.45.2-0ubuntu0~sevenmachines1

Trying to bring more awareness to properly installing the 64bit, I created a helpful little post

http://www.ianbmacdonald.com/wordpress/2010/02/19/install-64bit-flash-on-ubuntu

Revision history for this message
nussmaus (nussmaus111) wrote :

thank you...works well, doesn't it?

--- On Fri, 2/19/10, iMac <email address hidden> wrote:

From: iMac <email address hidden>
Subject: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: <email address hidden>
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 7:25 AM

This flash npviewer issue has been bugging me for ages (even moreso
since Karmic).  It seems the latest 64bit Flash PPA resolves my issues
(for a few days now), avoiding the wrapper completely, and providing
stability on repeated YouTubing (where I easily tripped on this).  I
expect similar results for firefox 3.5 version as well (noting my
Ubuntu-Tweaked versions below), but have little motivation to downgrade
and test more thoroughly.

ii  firefox                                         3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~mfs~karmic1
ii  flashplugin64-installer                10.0.45.2-0ubuntu0~sevenmachines1

Trying to bring more awareness to properly installing the 64bit, I
created a helpful little post

http://www.ianbmacdonald.com/wordpress/2010/02/19/install-64bit-flash-
on-ubuntu

--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

Are bug 178038 and bug 141613 dupes?

Revision history for this message
Lars Kumbier (derlars) wrote :

This bug is fixed for me, too, with the new 64bit beta 3 flashplugin from adobe.com (http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html).

Revision history for this message
perpetualrabbit (perpetualrabbit) wrote :

That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.
The fact is, there are still multiple bug in this 32-in-64 wrapper
thing. Because of the severe problems people were having with this,
choking up their linux workstations, I banned it from the network
altogether. I needed it for acroreader and flash. They do not provide
proper 64-bit versions, or uptodate versions of their product. No
64-bit acroread at all. Okular or evince is good enough as a pdf
reader plugin, and for flash there really is no proper substitute. I
hope some company will give some funding to bring Gnash up to the
level of support that the windows platform enjoys. I lost all faith in
good things coming from Adobe.
No photoshop for linux, no proper flash, no proper pdf reader, let
alone creator.
Still Adobe is an important provider of standards like PDF, flash,
postscript, so I hope that they do get their act together soon.
They are too important for linux indirectly to die. Otherwise I would
not care about them.

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM, derLars
<email address hidden> wrote:
> This bug is fixed for me, too, with the new 64bit beta 3 flashplugin
> from adobe.com (http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html).
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:26 AM, perpetualrabbit
<email address hidden> wrote:
> That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.

This is true, but it's a very acceptable workaround. If you have no
philosophical misgivings about running Adobe Flash, this really is the
way to do it on 64-bit systems.

Revision history for this message
Noel J. Bergman (noeljb) wrote :

The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and blessed solution?

Revision history for this message
gushi (ubuntu-gushi) wrote :

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:

> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
> about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
> blessed solution?

No official non-alpha-quality x64 bit version from the upstream vendor,
maybe? And yes, while it's true you are CURRENTLY able to download it
(even in alpha), that was not the case at the original inception of this
bug.

-Dan

--

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, gushi <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
>> about nspluginwrapper.  How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
>> blessed solution?
>
> No official non-alpha-quality x64 bit version from the upstream vendor,
> maybe?  And yes, while it's true you are CURRENTLY able to download it
> (even in alpha), that was not the case at the original inception of this
> bug.

So does that mean the bug is grandfathered in because it got here
first? In this case, alpha is just a label, and the 64-bit flash
player is much more stable than running 32-bit flash under
nspluginwrapper, according to many users who have commented on this
thread. There doesn't seem to be any reason to keep the 32-bit flash
plugin under nspluginwrapper that makes up for its brokenness.

Revision history for this message
krutoileshii (krutoileshii) wrote :

64bit flash is not the only problem there are still closed-source codecs out there that only exist in a 32 bit form.

Revision history for this message
has (henrik-a-schultz) wrote :

This bug applies to nspluginwrapper under Google Chrome too.
I also second using the 64-bit alpha over the 32-bit wrapped version!
More stable, better performance etc.
At least make it available in the repo's as an option! Like with the wine beta that co-existed with the production one.

Revision history for this message
giorgio130 (gm89) wrote :

+1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Aquilina (eagles051387) wrote :

+2 for flash-64 in the repos.

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 <email address hidden> wrote:

> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
Jonathan Aquilina

Revision history for this message
Johan Ryberg (jryberg) wrote :

+3 for flash-64 in the repos.

2010/3/28 eagles051387 <email address hidden>:
> +2 for flash-64 in the repos.
>
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>>
>> --
>> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

Revision history for this message
Pali (pali) wrote :

I have deb package of 64bit flash in my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~pali.rohar/+archive/ppa

Revision history for this message
Sandy Harris (sandyinchina) wrote :

Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No flash on page I was browsing. This did not take Firefox down.

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Aquilina (eagles051387) wrote :

sandy what are you goign to do on pages that do have flash?

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Sandy Harris <email address hidden>wrote:

> Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few
> terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No
> flash on page I was browsing. This did not take Firefox down.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
Jonathan Aquilina

Better (mar94co)
Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
djchandler (djchandler) wrote :

Back to +2 after my -1 for flash 64 in the repos. We would be better off to have no flash than force an Alpha on AMD64 users. The need for any plug-in unnecessary soon. Adobe is talking with Google about complete integration into Chrome. So this bug discussion could be renedered moot in the near future.

What Adobe is developing may never become a full-fledged 64-bit product. There's no plug-in for Windows or Mac being developed at all presently. Some features aren't even implemented yet.

Don't force an Alpha down my throat. The 64-bit Alpha isn't faster, and it breaks websites, especially ones that stream video. That can't possibly be better for most end-users. At least Hulu and ESPN 3 work now with the 32-bit plug-in and the wrapper. Take those away and, IMHO, you may as well have no plug-in at all.

Let's either fix nspluginwrapper, or tell people we're going to wait to see what Adobe is going to do.

BTW, what's going on with these previous two posts?

[quote]Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete[/quote]

[quote]Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed[/quote]

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
matter what package is in the repositories, you're not being forced to
run anything.

Revision history for this message
gushi (ubuntu-gushi) wrote :

On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Simon Ruggier wrote:

> I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
> themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
> seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
> matter what package is in the repositories, you're not being forced to
> run anything.

Hulu.

-Dan

--

"Little tramp sits in her room all day, sewing dolls! Children
misbehaving in the basement, and one in the walls, doing his business God
knows where! You children will be the death of me, *sniff*."

'Mommy', The People Under The Stairs

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------

Revision history for this message
Simon Ruggier (simon80) wrote :

Alas, since I live outside the US, Hulu works perfectly well at
telling me that I can't watch it, so I couldn't confirm that. Maybe I
will in the future.

Revision history for this message
giorgio130 (gm89) wrote :

Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone. No one is speaking about making it the default.

Revision history for this message
Miroslav Hadzhiev (xtigyro) wrote :

> Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> No one is speaking about making it the default.

+1

Revision history for this message
Niklas Herder (herder) wrote :

mån 2010-04-19 klockan 15:40 +0000 skrev Miro Hadzhiev (Хаджиев):
> > Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> > No one is speaking about making it the default.

+1

--
Niklas Herder | <email address hidden> | +46(0)8-161438
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
Stockholm University / Royal Institute Of Technology (KTH), Sweden

PGP: 145A6029 - PGP48D1 69F3 FA8E 4B58 74AC 086E D70B AFC6 145A 6029

Revision history for this message
Stéphane List (slist) wrote :

While listening music on Deezer, firefox becomes unstable after a lot of time (more than 30 minutes), it becomes slow, then the display freezes, my screen is full of white / grey. And after a few seconds, the PC reboots !

I'm using Ubuntu 10.04

Extract of my /var/log/messages :

...
Apr 19 11:19:18 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 724.651464] npviewer.bin[17989]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000ffb5537c error 14
Apr 19 11:24:34 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 1040.788621] npviewer.bin[18365]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000fff30b4c error 14
Apr 19 11:26:06 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 1132.627558] npviewer.bin[24056]: segfault at ff999ea8 ip 00000000ff999ea8 sp 00000000ffabacdc error 14
Apr 19 11:28:27 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped.
Apr 19 11:28:27 Ubuntu-desktop rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="551" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"] exiting on signal 15.
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: imklog 4.2.0, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="823" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"] (re)start
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop rsyslogd: rsyslogd's groupid changed to 102
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop rsyslogd: rsyslogd's userid changed to 101
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.32-21-generic (buildd@yellow) (gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 (Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2)
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-21-generic root=UUID=3042a777-a192-4275-bca3-55ad0599f0fc ro quiet splash
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009b000 (usable)
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000000009b000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
Apr 19 12:32:39 Ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
...

Revision history for this message
Henrik Binggl (henrik-binggl) wrote :

Found a hint in the fedoraforums. Basically saying that this could be related because of other video plugins interference.

    http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=174927&highlight=npviewer&page=3

In combination with the installation instructions for the native 64bit flash player of

    http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1358591

I could "solve" the problem for me.

> Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> No one is speaking about making it the default.

+1

Revision history for this message
Tom Slominski (tomslominski) wrote :

For me, Flash Player sometimes displays a grey box on YouTube, but the sound is still playing. And often after about 4 seconds of the video, it restarts it and then just works fine. Weird.

Changed in nspluginwrapper (Mandriva):
importance: Unknown → Critical
Changed in nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Triaged
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.