Ubuntu
calendarserver package

FFe: Sync calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Bug #631221 reported by Micah Gersten
64
This bug affects 11 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
calendarserver (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned
Nominated for Lucid by ivanbev
Maverick
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Please sync calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
According to bug 594399, calendarserver is currently uninstallable in maverick due to upgraded dependencies, since this package is supported in Debian, this seems like a better option than dropping the package. There do not appear to be any reverse depends on it, so this appears to be a leaf package.

Changelog entries since current maverick version 1.2.dfsg-9:

calendarserver (2.4.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Removed Uploaders field in debian/changelog
  * Changed build dependency python-dev to python
  * Updated standards version to 3.9.1
  * $remote_fs dependency has been added in init.d
  * Added NSS directory service backend
  * Added sample configuration for LDAP directory backend
  * Added PAM configuration file

 -- Rahul Amaram <email address hidden> Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:23:37 +0530

calendarserver (2.4.dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (Closes: #579610)
  * add LDAP directory backend
  * remove NSS directory backend (will be added soon)
  * add patch for linux xattr fix. Related Calendarserver ticket:
      http://trac.calendarserver.org/ticket/337

 -- Rahul Amaram <email address hidden> Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:57:56 +0530

Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

I subscribed Seb, because he rejected the nomination in the bug 426778, and I just wanted him to mention if there's a reason the FFe shouldn't be approved.

Changed in calendarserver (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

Last I looked at this it was (IIRC) totally broken. I think the downside risk is low.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

I've just cleaned the nomination because bugs open since karmic with no duplicate are not blockers

Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

I agree with Scott; FFe approved.

Changed in calendarserver (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

Filed bug 644964 for an outdated dependency

Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

BTW, It's an install dep, not a build dep

Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

Setting back to New for sponsor review.

Changed in calendarserver (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Confirmed → New
Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Uploaded.

Changed in calendarserver (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package calendarserver - 2.4.dfsg-2

---------------
calendarserver (2.4.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Removed Uploaders field in debian/changelog
  * Changed build dependency python-dev to python
  * Updated standards version to 3.9.1
  * $remote_fs dependency has been added in init.d
  * Added NSS directory service backend
  * Added sample configuration for LDAP directory backend
  * Added PAM configuration file

calendarserver (2.4.dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (Closes: #579610)
  * add LDAP directory backend
  * remove NSS directory backend (will be added soon)
  * add patch for linux xattr fix. Related Calendarserver ticket:
      http://trac.calendarserver.org/ticket/337
 -- Micah Gersten <email address hidden> Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:23:37 +0530

Changed in calendarserver (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Marc Sherman (msherman-projectile) wrote :

Is this update going to be available in the Lucid (LTS)? Calendarserver is currently installable in lucid.

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Marc,
No, most likely this won't go to Lucid.

Revision history for this message
ivanbev (ivan-beveridge) wrote :

Is there a reason for this not to go into Lucid? The version of Calendarserver in LTS is so old that it's probably not worth considering installing it (which is where I came into this).

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.